191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12260860)
1. County can't limit abortion funding more than state (New York).
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1978 Oct; 7(5):80. PubMed ID: 12260860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Illinois, Massachusetts: governors veto restrictions on state funds for abortion.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1977 Oct; 6(5):57-9. PubMed ID: 12308832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Medicaid in FY 78: states fund abortions, U.S. covers other family planning services.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1980 Apr; 9(2):28-34. PubMed ID: 12336219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Abortion and Medicaid: courts reject limits on funding medically necessary procedures.
Kalivoda P
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1979 Dec; 8(6):80-4. PubMed ID: 12278416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. State Medicaid abortion policies continue to be challenged; courts reach varying conclusions.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1979 Aug; 8(4):42-4. PubMed ID: 12309465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Supreme Court denies stay of Medicaid ruling.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1979 Aug; 8(4):45-6. PubMed ID: 12309467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Restrictions on Medicaid abortions open to challenge on state constitutional grounds.
Klassel D
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1980 Dec; 9(6):95-8. PubMed ID: 12262416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Grant recipients' rights in question.
Willson PD
Plan Parent Rev; 1984; 4(1):13-4. PubMed ID: 12266274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Over two-thirds of fertility-related state laws enacted in 1979 regulate abortion.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1980 Feb; 9(1):15-6. PubMed ID: 12278415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. City bar declares limits on abortion funding unfair, constitutionally suspect (New York).
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1978 Oct; 7(5):79. PubMed ID: 12277899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Colorado rejects regulations to limit Medicaid coverage for abortion.
Reprod Freedom News; 1994 May; 3(10):5-6. PubMed ID: 12319329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. From the world beyond Washington. The states and fertility-related laws: an analysis at mid-year.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1987 Aug; ():4-6. PubMed ID: 12281329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Coverage of abortion controversial in both public and private plans.
Sollom T
State Reprod Health Monit; 1996 Sep; 7(3):5-6. PubMed ID: 12347485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Regulation and the optimal size and type of abortion provider.
Haas-wilson D; Lindberg K
Appl Econ; 1999 Apr; 31(4):409-15. PubMed ID: 12295468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. States, Congress confront abortion services under Medicaid, health care plan.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1994 Jan; (1):3-4. PubMed ID: 12345518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In the states.
Reprod Freedom News; 1994 Feb; 3(4):5-8. PubMed ID: 12345515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The attempt to break down overseas population assistance: Population Crisis Committee.
Camp SL
Interaction; 1986 Jan; 6(1):8-9. PubMed ID: 12340678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Many state Medicaid agencies limit payment for abortion, sterilization.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1973 Aug; 2(4):82-3. PubMed ID: 12257657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Referendum relating to public funding for abortion, November 1988.
United States. Colorado
Annu Rev Popul Law; 1988; 15():48. PubMed ID: 12289579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Abortion funding restrictions on FY 80 DC budget limited to federal portion.
Rosoff JI
Plan Parent World Popul Wash Memo; 1979 Nov; ():1-2. PubMed ID: 12261989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
