190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12261153)
1. Health plan urges hospitals to provide sterilization.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1979 Feb; 8(1):9. PubMed ID: 12261153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Surveying outpatient services in the Southwest.
Rich M
AVSC News; 1989 Apr; 27(1):4, 6. PubMed ID: 12315715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. State legislatures demonstrate continuing interest in fertility-related issues.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1978 Feb; 7(1):6-7. PubMed ID: 12277837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Milwaukee story: a public hospital's resistance to the Supreme Court abortion rulings.
Ambrose L
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1975 Aug; 4(4):68-72. PubMed ID: 12334289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Study includes first comprehensive look at outpatient services.
AVSC News; 1986; 24(4):2-4, 6. PubMed ID: 12280509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The nurse practitioner in family planning services: law and practice.
Roemer R
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1977 Jun; 6(3):28-34. PubMed ID: 12259979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Legislative record: state legislatures--1973 bills.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1973 Apr; 2(2):37-43. PubMed ID: 12307104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. State legislatures: 1978 bills. 1. Bills enacted. B. Sterilization.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1978 Dec; 7(6):101. PubMed ID: 12278608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Financing family planning services: is categorical legislation still needed?
Mcfarlane DR; Meier KJ
Am J Gynecol Health; 1991; 5(5-6):130-7. PubMed ID: 12344741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Indiana: no immunity for judge who lacked authority to order sterilization of adolescent.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1977 Jun; 6(3):26-7. PubMed ID: 12259977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The legal issues surrounding the continued refusal of hospitals to allow abortions.
Wasserman R
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1975 Jun; 4(3):50-3. PubMed ID: 12307552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A national sterilization policy: no consensus, especially for the mentally incompetent.
Hart DS
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1978 Jun; 7(3):45-9. PubMed ID: 12260349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. From the world beyond Washington. The states and fertility-related laws: an analysis at mid-year.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1987 Aug; ():4-6. PubMed ID: 12281329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. General anesthesia for female sterilization under scrutiny.
Contracept Technol Update; 1990 Feb; 11(2):28-30. PubMed ID: 12344932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Public Law 100-202, Joint Resolution making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1988, and for other purposes, 22 December 1987.
United States
Annu Rev Popul Law; 1988; 15():215. PubMed ID: 12289429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Female sterilization, should its reversibility be promoted?
Contracept Technol Update; 1984 Feb; 5(2):13-6. PubMed ID: 12265920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. General Law on Health, 26 December 1983.
Mexico
Annu Rev Popul Law; 1987; 14():550-4. PubMed ID: 12346764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. AVS survey of freestanding and outpatient facilities.
AVS News; 1984 Dec; 22(4):3-4, 6. PubMed ID: 12266600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The cost of sterilization.
Ross JA
AVS News; 1983 Jul; 21(2):1-2. PubMed ID: 12265405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Decree No. 157 of 8 December 1986 revising the Family Code of the State of Hidalgo.
Mexico. Hidalgo
Annu Rev Popul Law; 1989; 16():10-1. PubMed ID: 12344018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
