470 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12262416)
1. Restrictions on Medicaid abortions open to challenge on state constitutional grounds.
Klassel D
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1980 Dec; 9(6):95-8. PubMed ID: 12262416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Abortion and Medicaid: courts reject limits on funding medically necessary procedures.
Kalivoda P
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1979 Dec; 8(6):80-4. PubMed ID: 12278416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ethical issues in U.S. family planning policy.
Benshoof J
Draper Fund Rep; 1983 Aug; (12):11-2. PubMed ID: 12338973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Grant recipients' rights in question.
Willson PD
Plan Parent Rev; 1984; 4(1):13-4. PubMed ID: 12266274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Coverage of abortion controversial in both public and private plans.
Sollom T
State Reprod Health Monit; 1996 Sep; 7(3):5-6. PubMed ID: 12347485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Minnesota court overturns ban on Medicaid coverage for abortion.
Reprod Freedom News; 1994 Jun; 3(12):3. PubMed ID: 12345511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. High court urged to reject Colorado appeal of finding that it must fund rape and incest survivors' abortions.
Reprod Freedom News; 1995 Nov; 4(20):2. PubMed ID: 12320281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. State Medicaid abortion policies continue to be challenged; courts reach varying conclusions.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1979 Aug; 8(4):42-4. PubMed ID: 12309465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Colorado rejects regulations to limit Medicaid coverage for abortion.
Reprod Freedom News; 1994 May; 3(10):5-6. PubMed ID: 12319329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Illinois, Massachusetts: governors veto restrictions on state funds for abortion.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1977 Oct; 6(5):57-9. PubMed ID: 12308832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. States, Congress confront abortion services under Medicaid, health care plan.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1994 Jan; (1):3-4. PubMed ID: 12345518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Supreme Court denies stay of Medicaid ruling.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1979 Aug; 8(4):45-6. PubMed ID: 12309467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Federal court rules on Hyde Amendment in Michigan case.
Reprod Freedom News; 1994 Jul; 3(14):2. PubMed ID: 12287944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. More family planning and abortion services needed.
Gold R
Plan Parent Rev; 1984; 3(4):5. PubMed ID: 12267090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Idaho judge rebuffs abortion funding rule.
Reprod Freedom News; 1994 Jul; 3(14):3. PubMed ID: 12287946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Medicaid in FY 78: states fund abortions, U.S. covers other family planning services.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1980 Apr; 9(2):28-34. PubMed ID: 12336219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Utah's ban on abortion coverage for low-income women challenged.
Reprod Freedom News; 1995 Feb; 4(3):2. PubMed ID: 12319148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. 2 states sued for not paying for abortions for poor.
Denniston L
Sun; 1994 Apr; ():3A. PubMed ID: 12288300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Regulation and the optimal size and type of abortion provider.
Haas-wilson D; Lindberg K
Appl Econ; 1999 Apr; 31(4):409-15. PubMed ID: 12295468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Senate, 59-40, defeats move to strike limits on Medicaid abortion coverage.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1993 Oct; (15):1-2. PubMed ID: 12286980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]