BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12266213)

  • 21. Comparative study of Lippes Loop and CuT inserted in immediate post-abortal period.
    Chowdhury NN; Mandal GS; Das M
    J Obstet Gynaecol India; 1979 Apr; 29(2):234-44. PubMed ID: 12156558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparative study of Copper IUDs.
    Prema K; Gayatri TL; Philips FS
    J Obstet Gynaecol India; 1979 Jun; 29(3):684-7. PubMed ID: 12335926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [The effect of intrauterine contraceptive devices on the endometrium].
    Sheppard BL; Bonnar J
    Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1987 Nov; 15(11):1015-24. PubMed ID: 12341565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Immuno and histochemical study of endometrium in women using copper IUCD.
    Mousa MA; El-mekkawi TM; Abdel Aziz AA; El-saharty MF
    Popul Sci; 1985; 6():41-50. PubMed ID: 12349093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device.
    Toivonen J
    Adv Contracept Deliv Syst; 1994; 10(3-4):191-8. PubMed ID: 12287838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Avoidance of the dimensional incompatibility as the main reason for side effects in intrauterine contraception.
    Kurz KH
    Contracept Deliv Syst; 1981 Jan; 2(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 12278585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Management of abnormal bleeding in an intrauterine device user].
    Desmons F; Adam-steen C
    Cah Sexol Clin; 1985; 11(63):185-7. PubMed ID: 12281357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A collaborative study of the progesterone intrauterine device (Progestasert). The World Health Organization Task Force on Methods for the Regulation of Implantation.
    Newton J; Szontagh F; Lebech P; Rowe P
    Contraception; 1979 Jun; 19(6):575-89. PubMed ID: 487808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Intrauterine device developments.
    Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1984; 5(4):4-6. PubMed ID: 12313225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Statement on intrauterine devices (IUDs).
    International Planned Parenthood Federation IPPF. International Medical Advisory Panel IMAP
    IPPF Med Bull; 1987 Dec; 21(6):3-5. PubMed ID: 12268853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comprehensive overview of intrauterine contraceptive device (IUCD).
    Nnatu S
    J Obstet Gynaecol East Cent Africa; 1983 Sep; 2(3):91-6. PubMed ID: 12340192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [A comparative study of the Copper T 200 IUD with or without string].
    Cohen J
    Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1987 Dec; 15(12):1157-60. PubMed ID: 12341738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A clinical evaluation of intrauterine contraceptive devices.
    Mukherjee SN; Mukherjee S
    J Obstet Gynaecol India; 1968 Apr; 18(2):237-43. PubMed ID: 12156551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. New developments in intrauterine devices.
    Farr G
    Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1991 Sep; 12(2):9. PubMed ID: 12284281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Intrauterine devices: an effective alternative to oral hormonal contraception.
    Prescrire Int; 2009 Jun; 18(101):125-30. PubMed ID: 19637436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of clinic related factors on continuation rates of IUDs.
    Reading AE; Goldstuck ND
    Contracept Deliv Syst; 1982 Jan; 3(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 12264121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Use of the bio-active intrauterine devices TCu 200 and IPCS 52 during the post-partum period].
    Lavin P; Bravo C; Waskaz C; Andrade MI; Bravo M; Caceres R; Castro J; Miranda L; Namur L; Olmos G
    Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1984 Mar; 12(3):483-8. PubMed ID: 12265945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Evaluation of the IUD: causes for removal].
    Da Silva PA; Martelly JU; Gauza JE; Barbosa LC
    J Bras Ginecol; 1987; 97(5):211-3. PubMed ID: 12281436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Intrauterine contraceptive device-its success and failure.
    Kishore N; Gupta K; Tandon V
    J Obstet Gynaecol India; 1968 Apr; 18(2):221-6. PubMed ID: 12331811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Intrauterine devices.
    Mccarthy TG; Ratnam SS
    Contemp Rev Obstet Gynaecol; 1992 Oct; 4(4):215-22. PubMed ID: 12345158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.