1979 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12266274)
1. Grant recipients' rights in question.
Willson PD
Plan Parent Rev; 1984; 4(1):13-4. PubMed ID: 12266274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The attempt to break down overseas population assistance: Population Crisis Committee.
Camp SL
Interaction; 1986 Jan; 6(1):8-9. PubMed ID: 12340678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Abortion-related issues in the U.S. foreign assistance program.
Mchugh JT
Int Rev; 1988; 12(4):330-9. PubMed ID: 12179687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Exporting abortion politics: the battle over international family planning assistance.
Lasher C
Conscience; 1991; 12(5):22-3. PubMed ID: 12178849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Public funding of contraceptive, sterilization and abortion services, 1982.
Nestor B; Gold RB
Fam Plann Perspect; 1984; 16(3):128-33. PubMed ID: 6432576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. USA President Clinton acts to ensure reproductive health.
IPPF Open File; 1993 Feb; ():1. PubMed ID: 12286731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. House vote on Hyde changes dynamic of Congressional abortion debate.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1993 Jul; (12):1-2. PubMed ID: 12286695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Title X program faces major upheaval as High Court okays ban on abortion speech.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1991 May; (9):1-4. PubMed ID: 12343265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Study cites unmet world demand for contraceptives.. House panel votes to increase Pop Aid funding, rescind program restrictions.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1991 May; (8):1-2. PubMed ID: 12316871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. New rules on family planning: a good compromise, or a dangerous precedent?
Schlitt C
Monday Dev; 2000 Jan; 18(2):7. PubMed ID: 12349537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. What's behind the antiabortion campaign over "fungibility"?
Cohen SA
Guttmacher Rep Public Policy; 1998 Jun; 1(3):1-2, 7. PubMed ID: 12348584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cruel summer: Congressional onslaught on sexual rights.
Daley D
SIECUS Rep; 1995; 24(1):16-8. PubMed ID: 12290591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. AID to restore support to pop groups shunned under Reagan and Bush.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1993 Aug; (13):3, 4. PubMed ID: 12318257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Family planning funding through four federal-state programs, FY 1997.
Gold RB; Sonfield A
Fam Plann Perspect; 1999; 31(4):176-81. PubMed ID: 10435216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. More family planning and abortion services needed.
Gold R
Plan Parent Rev; 1984; 3(4):5. PubMed ID: 12267090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Domestic, international family planning programs at risk.
Turnbull W; Kaeser L
Guttmacher Rep Public Policy; 1998 Feb; 1(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 12321447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Touting prevention, Clinton budget seeks increases for family planning.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1994 Feb; (4):1-2. PubMed ID: 12345595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Family planning at heart of political debate.
Kaeser L
Contracept Technol Update; 1998 Sep; 19(9):121-2. PubMed ID: 12348706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Public funding for contraceptive, sterilization and abortion services, 1994.
Sollom T; Gold RB; Saul R
Fam Plann Perspect; 1996; 28(4):166-73. PubMed ID: 8853282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Abortion and Medicaid: courts reject limits on funding medically necessary procedures.
Kalivoda P
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1979 Dec; 8(6):80-4. PubMed ID: 12278416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]