504 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12266284)
21. Comparison of two vaginal tablets: FHI findings mixed.
Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1983 Sep; 4(4):5. PubMed ID: 12279631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Lea's Shield: a study of the safety and efficacy of a new vaginal barrier contraceptive used with and without spermicide.
Mauck C; Glover LH; Miller E; Allen S; Archer DF; Blumenthal P; Rosenzweig A; Dominik R; Sturgen K; Cooper J; Fingerhut F; Peacock L; Gabelnick HL
Contraception; 1996 Jun; 53(6):329-35. PubMed ID: 8773419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A prospective study of the acceptability of Today vaginal contraceptive sponge among Malaysian women.
Ismail MT; Halim AJ; Arshat H
Malays J Reprod Health; 1987 Jun; 5(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 12269177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Sponge proves highly effective after second year of comparative trials.
Contracept Technol Update; 1986 Jan; 7(1):4-6. PubMed ID: 12267618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Investigators unable to substantiate suspected link between sponge, TSS.
Contracept Technol Update; 1983 Dec; 4(12):153-4. PubMed ID: 12339516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The state of the contraceptive art.
Tyrer LB; Duarte J
Plan Parent Rev; 1983; 3(2):5-7. PubMed ID: 12265618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. New Advantage 24 contraceptive gel claims 24-hour effectiveness. But proposed FDA rule could put N-9 products to the test.
Contracept Technol Update; 1995 Apr; 16(4):45-9. PubMed ID: 12347026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Contraception and pelvic infection in women].
Keith L; Berger GS; Brown ER
Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1986 Jan; 14(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 12341241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Lea's Shield: a phase I postcoital study of a new contraceptive barrier device.
Archer DF; Mauck CK; Viniegra-Sibal A; Anderson FD
Contraception; 1995 Sep; 52(3):167-73. PubMed ID: 7587188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The sponge at three years: research studies new, rehashes old questions.
Contracept Technol Update; 1986 Jul; 7(7):80-2. PubMed ID: 12267909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparative contraceptive efficacy of the female condom and other barrier methods.
Trussell J; Sturgen K; Strickler J; Dominik R
Fam Plann Perspect; 1994; 26(2):66-72. PubMed ID: 8033980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Barrier contraceptives reviewed for consumer.
Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1980 May; 1(3):1. PubMed ID: 12262524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Barrier methods of contraception.
Skrine RL
Practitioner; 1985 May; 229(1403):441-6. PubMed ID: 4011571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Vaginal contraception. Pt. 1 (author's transl)].
Keith L; Berger GS; Jackson M
Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1981 Apr; 9(4):253-60. PubMed ID: 12336893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Counseling for barrier methods.
Guest F
Health Educ Bull; 1979 Aug; ():1-4. PubMed ID: 12311791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. What is best birth control to use after having a baby?
Contracept Technol Update; 1989 Oct; 10(10):1S-2S. PubMed ID: 12342589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Barrier contraception.
Mills A
Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1984 Dec; 11(3):641-60. PubMed ID: 6150780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Contraceptive sponge patient insert warns of TSS.
FDA Drug Bull; 1984 Aug; 14(2):18-9. PubMed ID: 6479516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Sponge developer reacts to product's disadvantages; possible side effects.
Contracept Technol Update; 1984 Jul; 5(7):83. PubMed ID: 12313207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Efficacy of spermicides].
Erny R; Porte H
Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1991 Apr; 19(4):289-91. PubMed ID: 12343221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
