609 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12267463)
1. Abortion in America: 12 years after Roe v. Wade.
Popul Today; 1985 Nov; 13(11):2, 8-9. PubMed ID: 12267463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Abortion foes get turn to ask Supreme Court for constitutional protection.
Denniston L
Sun; 1994 Apr; ():10A. PubMed ID: 12287661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The role of women in abortion jurisprudence: from Roe to Casey and beyond.
Martin PA
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1993; 2(3):309-19. PubMed ID: 8293219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Courts rejecting maternal health rational for hospitalization for all mid-trimester abortions.
Donovan P
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1980 Dec; 9(6):91-4. PubMed ID: 12262415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Legal aspects of abortion practice.
Goldman EB
Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1986 Mar; 13(1):135-43. PubMed ID: 3709009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reproductive rights in jeopardy. The Supreme Court upholds restrictions on abortion.
Gleeson K
ZPG Report; 1992 Sep; 24(4):7. PubMed ID: 12317715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Court reaffirms Roe but upholds restrictions.
Fam Plann Perspect; 1992; 24(4):174-7, 185. PubMed ID: 1526274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Roe v. Wade. Revisiting the fundamentals.
Benshoof J
Conscience; 1998; 18(4):16-7. PubMed ID: 12178876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bare court majority reaffirms Roe, but standard for reviewing state laws is relaxed.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1992 Jul; (11):1-3. PubMed ID: 12286280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Abortion: rights or technicalities? A comparison of Roe v. Wade with the abortion decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court.
Brown HO
Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(3):60-74. PubMed ID: 11662181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Supreme Court refuses to review clinic access law; Second Appeals Court upholds statute.
Reprod Freedom News; 1995 Jun; 4(13):2-3. PubMed ID: 12346292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. U.S. abortion policy since Roe v. Wade.
Mcfarlane DR
Am J Gynecol Health; 1993; 7(4):98-106. PubMed ID: 12288251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinton repeals antiabortion policies as activists map out new strategies.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1993 Feb; (3):1-2. PubMed ID: 12286087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The right-to-life resurgence: recent victories push a struggling movement back to the forefront of the abortion battle.
Diconsiglio JM
Family Plan World; 1992; 2(1):9, 12-4. PubMed ID: 12317130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fetal viability as a threshold to personhood. A legal analysis.
Peterfy A
J Leg Med; 1995 Dec; 16(4):607-36. PubMed ID: 8568420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Beyond Roe, after Casey: the present and future of a "fundamental" right.
Benshoof J
Womens Health Issues; 1993; 3(3):162-70. PubMed ID: 8274872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Partial-birth abortion, Congress, and the Constitution.
Annas GJ
N Engl J Med; 1998 Jul; 339(4):279-83. PubMed ID: 9673308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. State may require abortion clinics to be licensed.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1979 Aug; 8(4):46-7. PubMed ID: 12309469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The laws that affect abortion in the United States and their impact on women's health.
Harrison LK; Naylor KL
Nurse Pract; 1991 Dec; 16(12):53-9. PubMed ID: 1798604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Supreme Court bars mandatory parental role in minors' abortions.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1979 Aug; 8(4):37-9. PubMed ID: 12278191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
