These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

67 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1226875)

  • 1. [Observer error in interpretation of chest-radiophotographs (author's transl)].
    Angerstein W; Oehmke G; Steinbrück P
    Z Erkr Atmungsorgane; 1975 Jan; 142(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 1226875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. DUAL READING as a routine procedure in mass radiography.
    Danish Tuberculosis Index
    Bull World Health Organ; 1955; 12(1-2):247-59. PubMed ID: 14351977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. 350 kV chest radiography has no diagnostic advantage: a comparison with 140 kV technique.
    Herman PG; Drummey J; Swensson RG; Hessel SJ; Balikian JP
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1982 Mar; 138(3):485-9. PubMed ID: 6977997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Omissions in radiology: faulty search or stringent reporting criteria?
    Swensson RG; Hessel SJ; Herman PG
    Radiology; 1977 Jun; 123(3):563-7. PubMed ID: 870932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Betwixt and between false positives and negatives.
    Hunter TB
    Rev Interam Radiol; 1980 Apr; 5(2):59-63. PubMed ID: 7384681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Eight CT lessons that we learned the hard way: an analysis of current patterns of radiological error and discrepancy with particular emphasis on CT.
    McCreadie G; Oliver TB
    Clin Radiol; 2009 May; 64(5):491-9; discussion 500-1. PubMed ID: 19348844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Roaming through methodology. XXXII. False test results].
    van der Weijden T; van den Akker M
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2001 May; 145(19):906-8. PubMed ID: 11387865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Frequent errors in the interpretation of chest x-ray films].
    Vock P
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1987 Jun; 117(24):928-32. PubMed ID: 3616585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A more accurate measure of the false-negative rate of Papanicolaou smear screening is obtained by determining the false-negative rate of the rescreening process.
    Renshaw AA; DiNisco SA; Minter LJ; Cibas ES
    Cancer; 1997 Oct; 81(5):272-6. PubMed ID: 9349513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pseudo-false positive eye/vision photoscreening due to accommodative insufficiency. A serendipitous benefit for poor readers?
    Arnold RW
    Binocul Vis Strabismus Q; 2004; 19(2):75-80. PubMed ID: 15180592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Narrowband teleradiology.
    Pagé G; Sylvestre J; Roberge FA; Grégoire A; Chalaoui J; Galand C; Laperrière J; Séguin R
    J Can Assoc Radiol; 1982 Dec; 33(4):221-6. PubMed ID: 7161299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improving performance by multiple interpretations of chest radiographs: effectiveness and cost.
    Hessel SJ; Herman PG; Swensson RG
    Radiology; 1978 Jun; 127(3):589-94. PubMed ID: 96485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of morphologic patterns of fine-needle aspiration of the breast to reduce false-negative results in breast cytology.
    Bulgaresi P; Cariaggi MP; Bonardi L; Carozzi MF; Confortini M; Galanti L; Maddau C; Matucci M; Rubeca T; Turco P; Ciatto S; Miccinesi G
    Cancer; 2005 Jun; 105(3):152-7. PubMed ID: 15861428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Computerized tomography and magnetic resonance in the diagnosis of recurrent rectal neoplasms: comparison of reliability and errors of both methods].
    Golfieri R; Totaro C; Giampalma E; Lalli A; Sbrozzi F; Soro A; Nogara G; Gavelli G
    Radiol Med; 1996 May; 91(5):601-9. PubMed ID: 8693127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. "False negatives" and "false positives" in acute pulmonary embolism: a clinical-postmortem comparison.
    Mandelli V; Schmid C; Zogno C; Morpurgo M
    Cardiologia; 1997 Feb; 42(2):205-10. PubMed ID: 9090162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Disagreements in chest roentgen interpretation.
    Herman PG; Gerson DE; Hessel SJ; Mayer BS; Watnick M; Blesser B; Ozonoff D
    Chest; 1975 Sep; 68(3):278-82. PubMed ID: 1157530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Exercise Tolerance Test: a comparison between true positive and false positive test results.
    Faisal AW; Abid AR; Azhar M
    J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2007; 19(4):71-4. PubMed ID: 18693603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Medical experts take chest imaging to task.
    Scheck A
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1997 Jan; 19(1):13, 15. PubMed ID: 10172921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The "chest wall factor" in the differential diagnosis of pathologic X-ray findings in thoracic maladies (author's transl)].
    Scheel W; Strauss B
    Z Erkr Atmungsorgane; 1980; 155(3):321-8. PubMed ID: 7222794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Chest infection caused by a subphrenic focus: analysis of 22 misdiagnosed cases (author's transl)].
    Ge LX
    Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Xi Ji Bing Za Zhi; 1979; 2(1):30-2. PubMed ID: 551907
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.