These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
445 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12269358)
1. The regulation of drugs and biologics: fifty years into the future. Kuhlik BN Food Drug Law J; 2000; 55(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 12269358 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Combination products regulation at the FDA. Lauritsen KJ; Nguyen T Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2009 May; 85(5):468-70. PubMed ID: 19381151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The ability of current biologics law to accommodate emerging technologies. Carter MJ Food Drug Law J; 1996; 51(3):375-80. PubMed ID: 11797714 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Supplemental applications proposing labeling changes for approved drugs, biologics, and medical devices. Final rule. Food and Drug Administration, HHS Fed Regist; 2008 Aug; 73(164):49603-10. PubMed ID: 18958946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The right to a trial: Should dying patients have access to experimental drugs? Groopman J New Yorker; 2006 Dec; ():40-7. PubMed ID: 17176539 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Takings issues in the approval of generic biologics. Yoo JC Food Drug Law J; 2005; 60(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 15940853 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The impact of FDA reform. Trunzo J Med Device Technol; 2003 Apr; 14(3):36-7. PubMed ID: 12789699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. FDA set to tighten guidelines on industry dissemination of information on unapproved uses of medical products. Lang L Gastroenterology; 2008 Apr; 134(4):905. PubMed ID: 18395067 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The Food and Drug Administration's regulation of dental products. Pinco RG; Rubin PD J Clin Dent; 1995; 6(3):165-9. PubMed ID: 8615957 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Understanding physician responsibilities and limitations for drug and device off-label use. Sclafani AP Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am; 2007 May; 15(2):251-4, viii. PubMed ID: 17544942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The FDA defense: a prescription for easing the pain of punitive damage awards in medical products liability cases. Marthaler AL Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 1997 Sep; (223):9-45. PubMed ID: 10173273 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Clarification: 510k is premarket notification; it provides no patent or FDA approval. Burkhart CG J Drugs Dermatol; 2008 Feb; 7(2):105. PubMed ID: 18335644 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Current regulatory and legal considerations for follow-on biologics. Kingham RF; Lietzan E Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2008 Nov; 84(5):633-5. PubMed ID: 18716615 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. US regulation of combination products. Donawa M Med Device Technol; 2009 Oct; 20(6):22, 24-5. PubMed ID: 20302139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. FDA policy and regulation of stereoisomers: paradigm shift and the future of safer, more effective drugs. Strong M Food Drug Law J; 1999; 54(3):463-87. PubMed ID: 11797710 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Communicating with the FDA: the "third rail" of a new model for drug development. Stanski DR; Orloff JJ J Clin Pharmacol; 2008 Feb; 48(2):144-5. PubMed ID: 18199890 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Why doctors should worry about preemption. Curfman GD; Morrissey S; Drazen JM N Engl J Med; 2008 Jul; 359(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 18596269 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. FDA attempting to overcome major roadblocks in monitoring drug safety. Zielinski SL J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Jun; 97(12):872-3. PubMed ID: 15956645 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]