These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

316 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12269591)

  • 1. Exploring levels of face familiarity by using an indirect face-matching measure.
    Clutterbuck R; Johnston RA
    Perception; 2002; 31(8):985-94. PubMed ID: 12269591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Matching familiar and unfamiliar faces on internal and external features.
    Young AW; Hay DC; McWeeny KH; Flude BM; Ellis AW
    Perception; 1985; 14(6):737-46. PubMed ID: 3837875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Activity in the right fusiform face area predicts the behavioural advantage for the perception of familiar faces.
    Weibert K; Andrews TJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Aug; 75():588-96. PubMed ID: 26187507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Familiar and unfamiliar face recognition: a review.
    Johnston RA; Edmonds AJ
    Memory; 2009 Jul; 17(5):577-96. PubMed ID: 19548173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Demonstrating the acquired familiarity of faces by using a gender-decision task.
    Clutterbuck R; Johnston RA
    Perception; 2004; 33(2):159-68. PubMed ID: 15109159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of familiarity on face adaptation.
    Laurence S; Hole G
    Perception; 2011; 40(4):450-63. PubMed ID: 21805920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The movement advantage in famous and unfamiliar faces: a comparison of point-light displays and shape-normalised avatar stimuli.
    Bennetts RJ; Kim J; Burke D; Brooks KR; Lucey S; Saragih J; Robbins RA
    Perception; 2013; 42(9):950-70. PubMed ID: 24386715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Viewers base estimates of face matching accuracy on their own familiarity: Explaining the photo-ID paradox.
    Ritchie KL; Smith FG; Jenkins R; Bindemann M; White D; Burton AM
    Cognition; 2015 Aug; 141():161-9. PubMed ID: 25988915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. 7-11-year-old children show an advantage for matching and recognizing the internal features of familiar faces: evidence against a developmental shift.
    Bonner L; Burton M
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Aug; 57(6):1019-29. PubMed ID: 15370514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Representations of familiar and unfamiliar faces as revealed by viewpoint-aftereffects.
    Ryu JJ; Chaudhuri A
    Vision Res; 2006 Nov; 46(23):4059-63. PubMed ID: 16996559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sensitivity to feature displacement in familiar and unfamiliar faces: beyond the internal/external feature distinction.
    Brooks KR; Kemp RI
    Perception; 2007; 36(11):1646-59. PubMed ID: 18265845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Early electrophysiological correlates of adaptation to personally familiar and unfamiliar faces across viewpoint changes.
    Caharel S; Jacques C; d'Arripe O; Ramon M; Rossion B
    Brain Res; 2011 Apr; 1387():85-98. PubMed ID: 21362409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long-term information and distributed neural activation are relevant for the "internal features advantage" in face processing: electrophysiological and source reconstruction evidence.
    Olivares EI; Saavedra C; Trujillo-Barreto NJ; Iglesias J
    Cortex; 2013; 49(10):2735-47. PubMed ID: 24025156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Familiarity and Within-Person Facial Variability: The Importance of the Internal and External Features.
    Kramer RSS; Manesi Z; Towler A; Reynolds MG; Burton AM
    Perception; 2018 Jan; 47(1):3-15. PubMed ID: 28803526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Face processing and familiarity: evidence from eye-movement data.
    Stacey PC; Walker S; Underwood JD
    Br J Psychol; 2005 Nov; 96(Pt 4):407-22. PubMed ID: 16248933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Making heads turn: the effect of familiarity and stimulus rotation on a gender-classification task.
    Stevenage SV; Osborne CD
    Perception; 2006; 35(11):1485-94. PubMed ID: 17286119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Identification of familiar and unfamiliar faces from internal and external features: some implications for theories of face recognition.
    Ellis HD; Shepherd JW; Davies GM
    Perception; 1979; 8(4):431-9. PubMed ID: 503774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Revisiting the processing of internal and external features of unfamiliar faces: the headscarf effect.
    Megreya AM; Bindemann M
    Perception; 2009; 38(12):1831-48. PubMed ID: 20192132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A familiarity disadvantage for remembering specific images of faces.
    Armann RG; Jenkins R; Burton AM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Apr; 42(4):571-80. PubMed ID: 26594877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perception of novel faces: the parts have it!
    Lobmaier JS; Mast FW
    Perception; 2007; 36(11):1660-73. PubMed ID: 18265846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.