77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12269894)
1. Do borderline nuclear changes in gynaecological cytology constitute a reliable reporting category?
Borderline Nuclear Changes National Slide Exchange Study Group
Cytopathology; 2002 Aug; 13(4):220-31. PubMed ID: 12269894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Proposed Sheffield quantitative criteria in cervical cytology to assist the grading of squamous cell dyskaryosis, as the British Society for Clinical Cytology definitions require amendment.
Slater DN; Rice S; Stewart R; Melling SE; Hewer EM; Smith JH
Cytopathology; 2005 Aug; 16(4):179-92. PubMed ID: 16048504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Outcome of SurePath™ cervical samples reported as borderline nuclear change by cytological subtype and high-risk HPV status.
Gupta N; Dudding N; Crossley J; Payyappilly SJ; Smith JH
Cytopathology; 2012 Dec; 23(6):402-7. PubMed ID: 22486817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Subtyping borderline nuclear changes: is it of value in predicting high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia on histology?
Shanbhag S; Roberts M; Johnson SJ; Wadehra V
Cytopathology; 2003 Oct; 14(5):241-8. PubMed ID: 14510887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Inadequate cervical smears: results of an educational slide exchange scheme. Trent Gynaecological Pathology Quality Assurance Group.
Cytopathology; 1999 Feb; 10(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 10068883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Appeals in gynecologic cytology proficiency testing: review and analysis of data from the 2006 College of American Pathologists gynecologic cytology proficiency testing program.
Crothers BA; Moriarty AT; Fatheree LA; Booth CN; Tench WD; Wilbur DC;
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2009 Jan; 133(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 19123735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Borderline nuclear change in cervical smears: five-year follow-up.
Grace A; Maguire G; Doherty S; Thornhill M; O'Dowd J; Leader M; Kay E
Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Nov; 29(5):267-9. PubMed ID: 14595793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improving consistency in cervical cytology reporting.
Mitchell H
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1993 Oct; 85(19):1592-6. PubMed ID: 8411232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the cervical cytology test using the PAPNET method and conventional microscopy.
Weissbrod D; Torres M; Rodríguez A; Ureña I; Estrada J; Reyes ME; Carreto AJ
Bull Pan Am Health Organ; 1996 Dec; 30(4):339-47. PubMed ID: 9041745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A quality control system involving peer review of abnormal cervical smears.
Palli D; Confortini M; Biggeri A; Russo A; Cariaggi P; Carozzi F; Minuti PA
Cytopathology; 1993; 4(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 8453014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of cervical cytology reporting rates: a useful adjunct to external quality assurance.
Butland D; Herbert A
Cytopathology; 1996 Dec; 7(6):391-9. PubMed ID: 8958472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The use of the 'borderline' category in the reporting of cervical cytopathology in the UK: results of a survey conducted under the aegis of the British Society for Clinical Cytology.
Duvall E
Cytopathology; 2008 Jun; 19(3):167-71. PubMed ID: 18241204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. External quality assessment in gynaecological cytology: The Trent Region experience. The Trent Regional Gynaecological Pathology Quality Assurance Group for the National Health Service Cervical Screening Programme.
Slater DN; Hewer EM; Melling SE; Rice S
Cytopathology; 2002 Aug; 13(4):206-19. PubMed ID: 12269893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Implementation and evaluation of a national external quality control program for cervical cytology in Mexico.
Flisser A; García-Malo F; Canepa Mde L; Doncel S; Espinoza R; Moreno R; Avila I; Pérez-Palacios G; Tapia-Conyer R; de la Fuente JR
Salud Publica Mex; 2002; 44(5):431-6. PubMed ID: 12389486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pale dyskaryosis in cervical smears.
McKee G
Cytopathology; 1997 Feb; 8(1):68. PubMed ID: 9068962
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Medicolegal affairs. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.
Frable WJ; Austin RM; Greening SE; Collins RJ; Hillman RL; Kobler TP; Koss LG; Mitchell H; Perey R; Rosenthal DL; Sidoti MS; Somrak TM
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):76-119; discussion 120-32. PubMed ID: 9479326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Significance of borderline nuclear abnormality in cervical smears.
Parham DM; Wiredu EK; Hussein KA
Cytopathology; 1992; 3(2):85-91. PubMed ID: 1617164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliability and accuracy in reporting CIN in 14 laboratories. Developing new indices of diagnostic variability in an interlaboratory study. The Working Group for External Quality Control in Cervical Cytopathology.
Branca M; Morosini P; Duca P; Verderio P; Giovagnoli MR; Riti MG; Leoncini L
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(6):1370-6. PubMed ID: 9850645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An overview of the College of American Pathologists' programs in surgical pathology and cytopathology. Data summary of diagnostic performance in cervical cytopathology.
Penner DW
Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(4):439-42. PubMed ID: 2750431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. BSCC, Bethesda or other? Terminology in cervical cytology European panel discussion.
Kocjan G; Priollet BC; Desai M; Koutselini H; Mahovlic V; Oliveira MH; Pohar-Marinsek Z; Sauer T; Schenk U; Shabalova I; Herbert A
Cytopathology; 2005 Jun; 16(3):113-9. PubMed ID: 15924605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
