BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12270445)

  • 1. Effects of three immunosuppressive regimens on CD4 helper function, B cell monocyte and cytokine responses in renal transplant recipients: 4-month follow-up of a prospective randomized study.
    Weimer R; Streller S; Staak A; Heilke M; Li D; Dietrich H; Daniel V; Feustel A; Rainer L; Zinn S; Friemann S; Ernst W; Grimm H; Padberg W; Zimmermann T; Opelz G
    Transplant Proc; 2002 Sep; 34(6):2377-8. PubMed ID: 12270445
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Conversion to tacrolimus immunosuppression in renal transplant recipients: 12-month follow-up.
    Citterio F; Scatà MC; Romagnoli J; Pozzetto U; Nanni G; Castagneto M
    Transplant Proc; 2002 Aug; 34(5):1685-6. PubMed ID: 12176535
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impaired T-cell IL-10 secretion and CD4 helper function in liver transplant patients treated with tacrolimus.
    Zipperle S; Weimer R; Golling M; Daniel V; Otto G; Opelz G
    Transplant Proc; 1997; 29(1-2):1079-80. PubMed ID: 9123208
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. sCD30 and neopterin as risk factors of chronic renal transplant rejection: impact of cyclosporine A, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil.
    Weimer R; Süsal C; Yildiz S; Streller S; Pelzl S; Staak A; Renner F; Dietrich H; Daniel V; Feuring E; Kamali-Ernst S; Ernst W; Padberg W; Opelz G
    Transplant Proc; 2005 May; 37(4):1776-8. PubMed ID: 15919463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A randomized trial with steroids and antithymocyte globulins comparing cyclosporine/azathioprine versus tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil (CATM2) in renal transplantation.
    Vacher-Coponat H; Moal V; Indreies M; Purgus R; Loundou A; Burtey S; Brunet P; Moussi-Frances J; Daniel L; Dussol B; Berland Y
    Transplantation; 2012 Feb; 93(4):437-43. PubMed ID: 22228415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of maintenance immunosuppressive regimens--balance between graft protective suppression of immune functions and a near physiological immune response.
    Weimer R; Deisz S; Dietrich H; Renner F; Bödeker RH; Daniel V; Kamali-Ernst S; Ernst W; Padberg W; Opelz G
    Transpl Int; 2011 Jun; 24(6):596-609. PubMed ID: 21401729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Randomized trial of three different immunosuppressive regimens to prevent chronic renal allograft rejection.
    Burke GW; Ciancio C; Blomberg BB; Rosen A; Suzart K; Roth D; Kupin W; Esquenazi V; Miller J
    Transplant Proc; 2002 Aug; 34(5):1610-1. PubMed ID: 12176505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tacrolimus in pancreas transplantation: a multicenter analysis. Tacrolimus Pancreas Transplant Study Group.
    Gruessner RW
    Clin Transplant; 1997 Aug; 11(4):299-312. PubMed ID: 9267719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical experience with Prograf (tacrolimus, FK 506) in Chinese patients after renal transplantation.
    Yu L; Wang Y; Fu SJ; Cheng XJ
    Transplant Proc; 2000 Nov; 32(7):1709-10. PubMed ID: 11119902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Primary immunosuppression with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclosporine and azathioprine in heart transplant recipients.
    Teebken OE; Strüber M; Harringer W; Pichlmaier MA; Haverich A
    Transplant Proc; 2002 Jun; 34(4):1265-8. PubMed ID: 12072335
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Longitudinal analysis of T and B cell phenotype and function in renal transplant recipients with or without rituximab induction therapy.
    Kamburova EG; Koenen HJ; van den Hoogen MW; Baas MC; Joosten I; Hilbrands LB
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e112658. PubMed ID: 25393622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of immunosuppressive induction regimens in renal transplantation. Collaborative Transplant Study.
    Opelz G
    Transplant Proc; 1998 Dec; 30(8):4029-30. PubMed ID: 9865286
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tacrolimus versus cyclosporine as primary prophylactic therapy after cadaveric renal transplant: two-year survival study.
    Wong KM; Cheung CY; Chan YH; Chak WL; Choi KS; Chau KF; Li CS
    Transplant Proc; 2000 Nov; 32(7):1721-2. PubMed ID: 11119907
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Randomized trial of tacrolimus + mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine versus cyclosporine + mycophenolate mofetil after cadaveric kidney transplantation: results at three years.
    Gonwa T; Johnson C; Ahsan N; Alfrey EJ; Halloran P; Stegall M; Hardy M; Metzger R; Shield C; Rocher L; Scandling J; Sorensen J; Mulloy L; Light J; Corwin C; Danovitch G; Wachs M; VanVeldhuisen P; Leonhardt M; Fitzsimmons WE
    Transplantation; 2003 Jun; 75(12):2048-53. PubMed ID: 12829910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Treatment of acute renal transplant rejection with FK 506 in patients on cyclosporine after failure of standard antirejection therapy.
    Scott-Douglas N; Zimmerman D; Klassen J
    Transplant Proc; 1996 Dec; 28(6):3165. PubMed ID: 8962226
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Drug regimens affect cadaveric kidney graft survival.
    Kauffman HM; Cherikh WS; Delmonico FL
    Transplant Proc; 2001; 33(1-2):1029-30. PubMed ID: 11267176
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Randomized trial of tacrolimus (Prograf) in combination with azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclosporine (Neoral) with mycophenolate mofetil after cadaveric kidney transplantation.
    Johnson C; Ahsan N; Gonwa T; Halloran P; Stegall M; Hardy M; Metzger R; Shield C; Rocher L; Scandling J; Sorensen J; Mulloy L; Light J; Corwin C; Danovitch G; Wachs M; van Veldhuisen P; Salm K; Tolzman D; Fitzsimmons WE
    Transplantation; 2000 Mar; 69(5):834-41. PubMed ID: 10755536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Trends in maintenance immunosuppressive drugs used in taiwanese kidney transplant recipients: an analysis of the national health insurance research database.
    Tsai SF; Cheng CY; Shu KH; Wu MJ
    Transplant Proc; 2012 Jan; 44(1):190-2. PubMed ID: 22310612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of different anti-rejection regimens on the expression of differentiation and activation markers on the surface of host lymphocytes.
    Malinowski K; Ye H; Waltzer WC
    Transplant Proc; 2000 Jun; 32(4):773-5. PubMed ID: 10856579
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Results with histological diagnosis in kidney transplant rejections treated with 15-deoxyspergualin.
    Kyo M; Ichikawa Y; Hanafusa T; Fukunishi T; Nagano S; Takahara S; Kokado Y; Okuyama A; Ihara H; Ito K; Sagawa S; Sonoda T; Akiyama T; Kurita T; Suzuki S; Amemiya H
    Transplant Proc; 1996 Apr; 28(2):910-1. PubMed ID: 8623457
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.