These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12270591)

  • 41. P300, probability, and interstimulus interval.
    Polich J
    Psychophysiology; 1990 Jul; 27(4):396-403. PubMed ID: 2236442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Response selection and initiation in speeded reactions: a pupillometric analysis.
    Richer F; Silverman C; Beatty J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1983 Jun; 9(3):360-70. PubMed ID: 6223976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. High-probability stimulus control topographies with delayed S+ onset in a simultaneous discrimination procedure.
    McIlvane WJ; Kledaras JB; Callahan TC; Dube WV
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 Mar; 77(2):189-98. PubMed ID: 11936251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The role of similarity in human associative learning.
    Grand C; Close J; Hale J; Honey RC
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2007 Jan; 33(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 17227196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The comparator theory fails to account for the selective role of within-compound associations in cue-selection effects.
    Melchers KG; Lachnit H; Shanks DR
    Exp Psychol; 2006; 53(4):316-20. PubMed ID: 17176664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Statistical learning within and between modalities: pitting abstract against stimulus-specific representations.
    Conway CM; Christiansen MH
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Oct; 17(10):905-12. PubMed ID: 17100792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Adaptive categorization in unsupervised learning.
    Clapper JP; Bower GH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Sep; 28(5):908-923. PubMed ID: 12219798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [Inductive versus associative processes in stimulus discrimination].
    Lachnit H
    Z Exp Angew Psychol; 1994; 41(3):415-25. PubMed ID: 7801649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. More learned irrelevance than perseveration errors in rule shifting in healthy subjects.
    Maes JH; Damen MD; Eling PA
    Brain Cogn; 2004 Apr; 54(3):201-11. PubMed ID: 15050775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Second-order backward blocking and unovershadowing in human causal learning.
    De Houwer J; Beckers T
    Exp Psychol; 2002; 49(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 11975146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Inhibition, response mode, and stimulus probability: a comparative event-related potential study.
    Bruin KJ; Wijers AA
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2002 Jul; 113(7):1172-82. PubMed ID: 12088714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Exemplar effects in the context of a categorization rule: Featural and holistic influences.
    Thibaut JP; Gelaes S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Nov; 32(6):1403-15. PubMed ID: 17087592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Contextual modulation of attention in human category learning.
    George DN; Kruschke JK
    Learn Behav; 2012 Dec; 40(4):530-41. PubMed ID: 22528785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Dynamics and constraints in insight problem solving.
    Ormerod TC; MacGregor JN; Chronicle EP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jul; 28(4):791-9. PubMed ID: 12109769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Source analysis of the N2 in a cued Go/NoGo task.
    Bekker EM; Kenemans JL; Verbaten MN
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Feb; 22(2):221-31. PubMed ID: 15653295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The discrimination of relative frequency by pigeons.
    Machado A; Cevik M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1997 Jan; 67(1):11-41. PubMed ID: 9037781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Out of sight, out of mind: Categorization learning and normal aging.
    Schenk S; Minda JP; Lech RK; Suchan B
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Oct; 91():222-233. PubMed ID: 27534998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Effect of target probability on pre-stimulus brain activity.
    Lucci G; Berchicci M; Perri RL; Spinelli D; Di Russo F
    Neuroscience; 2016 May; 322():121-8. PubMed ID: 26912279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Producing biased diagnoses with unambiguous stimuli: The importance of feature instantiations.
    Hannah SD; Brooks LR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Nov; 32(6):1416-23. PubMed ID: 17087593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Stimulus similarity affects patterning discrimination learning.
    George DN
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2018 Apr; 44(2):128-148. PubMed ID: 29683694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.