These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Risk assessment scales for pressure ulcers: a methodological review. Papanikolaou P; Lyne P; Anthony D Int J Nurs Stud; 2007 Feb; 44(2):285-96. PubMed ID: 17141782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The levels of reliability and validity of the Waterlow pressure sore risk calculator. Edwards M J Wound Care; 1995 Sep; 4(8):373-8. PubMed ID: 7553188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The reliability of pressure sore risk-assessment tools. MacDonald K Prof Nurse; 1995 Dec; 11(3):169-70, 172. PubMed ID: 8552688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An interrater reliability study of the assessment of pressure ulcer risk using the Braden scale and the classification of pressure ulcers in a home care setting. Kottner J; Halfens R; Dassen T Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Oct; 46(10):1307-12. PubMed ID: 19406400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predictive validity of 4 risk assessment scales for prediction of pressure ulcer development in a hospital setting. Källman U; Lindgren M Adv Skin Wound Care; 2014 Feb; 27(2):70-6. PubMed ID: 24440864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The development of the Glamorgan paediatric pressure ulcer risk assessment scale. Willock J; Baharestani MM; Anthony D J Wound Care; 2009 Jan; 18(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 19131913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Skin alterations of intact skin and risk factors associated with pressure ulcer development in surgical patients: a cohort study. Nixon J; Cranny G; Bond S Int J Nurs Stud; 2007 Jul; 44(5):655-63. PubMed ID: 16631178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pressure ulcer risk assessment in critical care: interrater reliability and validity studies of the Braden and Waterlow scales and subjective ratings in two intensive care units. Kottner J; Dassen T Int J Nurs Stud; 2010 Jun; 47(6):671-7. PubMed ID: 20003975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An evaluation of the Waterlow pressure ulcer risk-assessment tool. Thompson D Br J Nurs; 2005 Apr 28-May 11; 14(8):455-9. PubMed ID: 15924028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An investigation into the use of serum albumin in pressure sore prediction. Anthony D; Reynolds T; Russell L J Adv Nurs; 2000 Aug; 32(2):359-65. PubMed ID: 10964183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Reliability and validity of the Braden Scale for predicting pressure sore risk]. Boes C Pflege; 2000 Dec; 13(6):397-402. PubMed ID: 11221209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predictive validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the risk assessment pressure sore scale in intensive care patients: results of a prospective study. Günes ÜY; Efteli E Ostomy Wound Manage; 2015 Apr; 61(4):58-62. PubMed ID: 25853378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Do risk assessment scales for pressure ulcers work? Anthony D; Papanikolaou P; Parboteeah S; Saleh M J Tissue Viability; 2010 Nov; 19(4):132-6. PubMed ID: 20036124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predictive validity of Waterlow Scale for pressure ulcer development risk in hospitalized patients. Serpa LF; de Gouveia Santos VL; Gomboski G; Rosado SM J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2009; 36(6):640-6. PubMed ID: 19920745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pressure ulcer grading tools: how reliable are they? Sharp A J Wound Care; 2004 Feb; 13(2):75-7. PubMed ID: 14999993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pressure ulcer scale for healing: derivation and validation of the PUSH tool. The PUSH Task Force. Thomas DR; Rodeheaver GT; Bartolucci AA; Franz RA; Sussman C; Ferrell BA; Cuddigan J; Stotts NA; Maklebust J Adv Wound Care; 1997 Sep; 10(5):96-101. PubMed ID: 9362591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]