These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

387 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12271350)

  • 1. In vitro study of transmission of bacteria from contaminated metal models to stone models via impressions.
    Sofou A; Larsen T; Owall B; Fiehn NE
    Clin Oral Investig; 2002 Sep; 6(3):166-70. PubMed ID: 12271350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An analysis of the persistent presence of opportunistic pathogens on patient-derived dental impressions and gypsum casts.
    Egusa H; Watamoto T; Abe K; Kobayashi M; Kaneda Y; Ashida S; Matsumoto T; Yatani H
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 18350950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Antimicrobial effect of 4 disinfectants on alginate, polyether, and polyvinyl siloxane impression materials.
    Al-Jabrah O; Al-Shumailan Y; Al-Rashdan M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(3):299-307. PubMed ID: 17580464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contamination level of alginate impressions arriving at a dental laboratory.
    Sofou A; Larsen T; Fiehn NE; Owall B
    Clin Oral Investig; 2002 Sep; 6(3):161-5. PubMed ID: 12271349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
    Caputi S; Varvara G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of different storage conditions on polyether and polyvinylsiloxane impressions.
    Purk JH; Willes MG; Tira DE; Eick JD; Hung SH
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1998 Jul; 129(7):1014-21. PubMed ID: 9685767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impression techniques and misfit-induced strains on implant-supported superstructures: an in vitro study.
    Cehreli MC; Akça K
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2006 Aug; 26(4):379-85. PubMed ID: 16939020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study.
    Lee H; Ercoli C; Funkenbusch PD; Feng C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 18262011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. High-level microwave disinfection of dental gypsum casts.
    Berg E; Nielsen O; Skaug N
    Int J Prosthodont; 2005; 18(6):520-5. PubMed ID: 16335173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pre- and post-set hydrophilicity of elastomeric impression materials.
    Michalakis KX; Bakopoulou A; Hirayama H; Garefis DP; Garefis PD
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):238-48. PubMed ID: 17559537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Disinfection of bacterially contaminated hydrophilic PVS impression materials.
    Estafanous EW; Palenik CJ; Platt JA
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Jan; 21(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 22040354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dimensional accuracy of 2-stage putty-wash impressions: influence of impression trays and viscosity.
    Balkenhol M; Ferger P; Wöstmann B
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(6):573-5. PubMed ID: 18069363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of five impression techniques on the dimensional accuracy of master models.
    Fenske C
    Braz Dent J; 2000; 11(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 11210270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reproduction of details using dental stones and investment material in impressions of elastomers and waxes.
    Nilner K; Owall B
    Swed Dent J; 1982; 6(6):249-55. PubMed ID: 6963007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Disinfection of irreversible hydrocolloid impressions: a comparative study.
    McNeill MR; Coulter WA; Hussey DL
    Int J Prosthodont; 1992; 5(6):563-7. PubMed ID: 1339136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of dimensional accuracy between three different addition cured silicone impression materials.
    Forrester-Baker L; Seymour KG; Samarawickrama D; Zou L; Cherukara G; Patel M
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2005 Jun; 13(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 16011234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of 2 impression techniques for ITI implants.
    Akça K; Cehreli MC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(4):517-23. PubMed ID: 15346748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the fit of Procera crowns made from stone with those made from polyurethane resin.
    Rahme HY; Adib SM; Zebouni EA; Bechara BB; Rifai KT
    Gen Dent; 2009; 57(2):171-9. PubMed ID: 19552368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Digitization of simulated clinical dental impressions: virtual three-dimensional analysis of exactness.
    Persson AS; Odén A; Andersson M; Sandborgh-Englund G
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jul; 25(7):929-36. PubMed ID: 19264353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Disinfection of dental stone casts: antimicrobial effects and physical property alterations.
    Ivanovski S; Savage NW; Brockhurst PJ; Bird PS
    Dent Mater; 1995 Jan; 11(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 7498603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.