These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1227283)

  • 1. Efficiency of dust sampling inlets in calm air.
    Breslin JA; Stein RL
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1975 Aug; 36(8):576-83. PubMed ID: 1227283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance characteristics of the 10 mm respirable mass sampler: Part II--coal dust studies.
    Caplan KJ; Doemeny LJ; Sorenson SD
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1977 Apr; 38(4):162-73. PubMed ID: 868754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A new two-stage respirable dust sampler.
    Tomb TF; Treaftis HN
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1975 Jan; 36(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 1111262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Study of fifteen respirable aerosol samplers used in occupational hygiene.
    Görner P; Wrobel R; Micka V; Skoda V; Denis J; Fabriès JF
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2001 Jan; 45(1):43-54. PubMed ID: 11137698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sampling efficiency of modified 37-mm sampling cassettes using computational fluid dynamics.
    Anthony TR; Sleeth D; Volckens J
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2016; 13(2):148-58. PubMed ID: 26513395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of coarse coal dust sampling techniques in a laboratory-simulated longwall section.
    Patts JR; Barone TL
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2017 May; 14(5):323-334. PubMed ID: 27792474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of ionic air purifiers for reducing aerosol exposure in confined indoor spaces.
    Grinshpun SA; Mainelis G; Trunov M; Adhikari A; Reponen T; Willeke K
    Indoor Air; 2005 Aug; 15(4):235-45. PubMed ID: 15982270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of personal direct-reading dust monitors for the measurement of airborne inhalable dust.
    Thorpe A
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2007 Jan; 51(1):97-112. PubMed ID: 16799158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance of personal inhalable aerosol samplers in very slowly moving air when facing the aerosol source.
    Witschger O; Grinshpun SA; Fauvel S; Basso G
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2004 Jun; 48(4):351-68. PubMed ID: 15191944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Dust collection efficiency of commercial gas collection tubes].
    Hata M; Furuuchi M; Sok P; Amin M; Umehara Y; Takao M; Higashikubo I; Imanaka T; Suzuki Y; Nakamura A; Yamazaki M
    Sangyo Eiseigaku Zasshi; 2022 Jul; 64(4):186-197. PubMed ID: 34657897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation and field calibration of the Miniram PDM-3 aerosol monitor for measuring respirable and total coal dust.
    Middendorf PJ; Lehocky AH; Williams PL
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1999; 60(4):502-11. PubMed ID: 10462784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Critique of 1985 ACGIH report on particle size-selective sampling in the workplace.
    Bartley DL; Doemeny LJ
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1986 Aug; 47(8):443-7. PubMed ID: 3751894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Laboratory study of selected personal inhalable aerosol samplers.
    Görner P; Simon X; Wrobel R; Kauffer E; Witschger O
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2010 Mar; 54(2):165-87. PubMed ID: 20147627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of impactor inlet efficiency on the measurement of wood dust size distribution.
    Li SN; Lundgren DA; Rovell-Rixx D; Ray AE
    AIHAJ; 2001; 62(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 11258864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sampling and interpretation errors in aerosol monitoring.
    Willeke K; Baron PA
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1990 Mar; 51(3):160-8. PubMed ID: 2327327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Measuring cyclone for the evaluation of dust sampling instruments SPG 10 AND SPG 210].
    Schlesinger W
    Z Gesamte Hyg; 1989 May; 35(5):262-3. PubMed ID: 2750231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of portable, real-time dust monitors sampling actively, with size-selective adaptors, and passively.
    Thorpe A; Walsh PT
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2007 Nov; 51(8):679-91. PubMed ID: 18024485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An evaluation of the GCA respirable dust monitor 101-1.
    Marple VA; Rubow KL
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1978 Jan; 39(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 204180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of probe bluntness on sampling particulates from calm air.
    Sansone EB; Christensen WD
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1978 Jan; 39(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 629206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Design and performance of UPAS inlets for respirable and thoracic mass sampling.
    Leith D; L'Orange C; Mehaffy J; Volckens J
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2020 Jun; 17(6):274-282. PubMed ID: 32282284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.