175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12277899)
21. Catholic groups challenge Pregnancy Discrimination Act's abortion section.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1979 Aug; 8(4):55. PubMed ID: 12309472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. State cannot require all minors to seek parental consent for abortion (Illinois).
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1978 Oct; 7(5):75-6. PubMed ID: 12277895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The consequences of abortion legislation.
Braude M
Women Ther; 1983; 2(2-3):81-90. PubMed ID: 12340335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Ethical issues in U.S. family planning policy.
Benshoof J
Draper Fund Rep; 1983 Aug; (12):11-2. PubMed ID: 12338973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. States, Congress confront abortion services under Medicaid, health care plan.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1994 Jan; (1):3-4. PubMed ID: 12345518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Exporting abortion politics: the battle over international family planning assistance.
Lasher C
Conscience; 1991; 12(5):22-3. PubMed ID: 12178849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Proposed Title 20 rules could jeopardize delivery of family planning services.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1975 Jun; 4(3):47-8. PubMed ID: 12307551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Fetal viability as a threshold to personhood. A legal analysis.
Peterfy A
J Leg Med; 1995 Dec; 16(4):607-36. PubMed ID: 8568420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Idaho judge rebuffs abortion funding rule.
Reprod Freedom News; 1994 Jul; 3(14):3. PubMed ID: 12287946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Colorado rejects regulations to limit Medicaid coverage for abortion.
Reprod Freedom News; 1994 May; 3(10):5-6. PubMed ID: 12319329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Three judge panel to rule on contraceptive law.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1974 Dec; 3(6):111. PubMed ID: 12257993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Abortion: the continuing controversy.
Behrens CE
Popul Bull; 1972 Aug; 28(4):6-29. PubMed ID: 12306354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Abortion-related issues in the U.S. foreign assistance program.
Mchugh JT
Int Rev; 1988; 12(4):330-9. PubMed ID: 12179687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Tracking the trends. Year-end review of 1995 state actions on reproductive health policy. Abortion services.
Sollom T
State Reprod Health Monit; 1995 Dec; 6(4):1-3. PubMed ID: 12291286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. State may require abortion clinics to be licensed.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1979 Aug; 8(4):46-7. PubMed ID: 12309469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Courts bar enforcement of restrictive abortion laws (Kentucky, Louisiana).
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1978 Oct; 7(5):78. PubMed ID: 12277898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. New abortion laws introduce informed and parental consent.
Family Plan World; 1991; 1(2):25. PubMed ID: 12284517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Doctors, hospitals may refuse to perform abortions.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1973 Apr; 2(2):26. PubMed ID: 12307100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Courts rejecting maternal health rational for hospitalization for all mid-trimester abortions.
Donovan P
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1980 Dec; 9(6):91-4. PubMed ID: 12262415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Supreme Court denies reargument on abortion.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1973 Apr; 2(2):25-6. PubMed ID: 12307099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
