280 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12278415)
1. Over two-thirds of fertility-related state laws enacted in 1979 regulate abortion.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1980 Feb; 9(1):15-6. PubMed ID: 12278415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Illinois, Massachusetts: governors veto restrictions on state funds for abortion.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1977 Oct; 6(5):57-9. PubMed ID: 12308832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Family planning funds increased tenfold since FY 1971 while staff remained constant.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1977 Oct; 6(5):62-5. PubMed ID: 12308833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. New state fertility-related laws dropped sharply in 1980 to lowest total since 1972.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1981 Feb; 10(1):4-5, 14. PubMed ID: 12310241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. State Medicaid abortion policies continue to be challenged; courts reach varying conclusions.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1979 Aug; 8(4):42-4. PubMed ID: 12309465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Abortion and Medicaid: courts reject limits on funding medically necessary procedures.
Kalivoda P
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1979 Dec; 8(6):80-4. PubMed ID: 12278416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. State legislatures demonstrate continuing interest in fertility-related issues.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1978 Feb; 7(1):6-7. PubMed ID: 12277837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. From the world beyond Washington. The states and fertility-related laws: an analysis at mid-year.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1987 Aug; ():4-6. PubMed ID: 12281329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The nurse practitioner in family planning services: law and practice.
Roemer R
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1977 Jun; 6(3):28-34. PubMed ID: 12259979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Grant recipients' rights in question.
Willson PD
Plan Parent Rev; 1984; 4(1):13-4. PubMed ID: 12266274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Supreme Court denies stay of Medicaid ruling.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1979 Aug; 8(4):45-6. PubMed ID: 12309467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Coverage of abortion controversial in both public and private plans.
Sollom T
State Reprod Health Monit; 1996 Sep; 7(3):5-6. PubMed ID: 12347485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. State legislators introduce numerous abortion bills.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1973 Apr; 2(2):36. PubMed ID: 12307103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Restrictions on Medicaid abortions open to challenge on state constitutional grounds.
Klassel D
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1980 Dec; 9(6):95-8. PubMed ID: 12262416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Colorado rejects regulations to limit Medicaid coverage for abortion.
Reprod Freedom News; 1994 May; 3(10):5-6. PubMed ID: 12319329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Tracking the trends. Year-end review of 1995 state actions on reproductive health policy. Abortion services.
Sollom T
State Reprod Health Monit; 1995 Dec; 6(4):1-3. PubMed ID: 12291286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. County can't limit abortion funding more than state (New York).
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1978 Oct; 7(5):80. PubMed ID: 12260860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Supreme Court denies reargument on abortion.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1973 Apr; 2(2):25-6. PubMed ID: 12307099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. High court urged to reject Colorado appeal of finding that it must fund rape and incest survivors' abortions.
Reprod Freedom News; 1995 Nov; 4(20):2. PubMed ID: 12320281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. City bar declares limits on abortion funding unfair, constitutionally suspect (New York).
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1978 Oct; 7(5):79. PubMed ID: 12277899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
