256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12280672)
1. [The loop, after 20 years: evaluation of its utilization in the world].
Hutchings JE; Benson PJ; Perkin GW; Soderstrom RM
Perspect Internation Plan Fam; 1986; (Special):11-20. PubMed ID: 12280672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Statement on intrauterine devices (IUDs).
International Planned Parenthood Federation IPPF. International Medical Advisory Panel IMAP
IPPF Med Bull; 1987 Dec; 21(6):3-5. PubMed ID: 12268853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [The end of IUD marketing in the United States: what does it mean for American women?].
Forrest JD
Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1987 Mar; 15(3):291-300. PubMed ID: 12341479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The IUD: dispelling the myths and assessing the potential.
Mishell Dr ; Sulak PJ
Dialogues Contracept; 1997; 5(2):1-4. PubMed ID: 12292543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intrauterine devices: an effective alternative to oral hormonal contraception.
Prescrire Int; 2009 Jun; 18(101):125-30. PubMed ID: 19637436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Health risks of intrauterine contraception (author's transl)].
Keith LG; Berger GS; Edelman DA
Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1983 Jun; 11(6):801-8. PubMed ID: 12338737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Update on intrauterine devices.
Tyrer LB
Curr Probl Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Mar; 2(7):1-24. PubMed ID: 12262503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intrauterine devices (IUDs) and their complications (clinical evaluation of 2013 women with IUD in-situ).
Ayhan A; Ozalp S; Aslan A
Acta Reprod Turc; 1982 Oct; 4(2):34-8. PubMed ID: 12267258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of IUDs in developing countries: a comparative study.
Farr G; Burdan A
Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1991 Sep; 12(2):6-8, 12. PubMed ID: 12284280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Acceptability of IUDs is increasing.
Finger WR; Barr D
Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1992 Oct; 13(2):27-30. PubMed ID: 12286082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intrauterine devices.
Mccarthy TG; Ratnam SS
Contemp Rev Obstet Gynaecol; 1992 Oct; 4(4):215-22. PubMed ID: 12345158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Steroid intra-uterine contraception: progesterone-releasing devices. II. Insertion, clinical problems and contraceptive dependability].
Custo GM; Cosmi EV
Patol Clin Ostet Ginecol; 1984; 12(4):331-43. PubMed ID: 12340352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [The TCu380 IUD: initial international experimental results with the latest "T" family IUD].
Elia D; Belaisch J
Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1985 Sep; 13(9):973-8. PubMed ID: 12267501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-term use of intrauterine devices.
Novak MK; Andolsek L; Balogh SA; Waszak CS
IPPF Med Bull; 1988 Feb; 22(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 12281431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intrauterine devices.
Gromko L
Nurse Pract; 1980; 5(4):17,20-1, passim. PubMed ID: 7413110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Interception by post-coital IUD insertion.
Van Santen MR; Haspels AA
Contracept Deliv Syst; 1981 Jul; 2(3):189-200. PubMed ID: 12278905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Today's IUDs offer safe, effective contraception.
Finger WR
Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1993 Mar; 13(3):12-5. PubMed ID: 12318094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The IUD: will its future always be crippled by its past?
Farr G
Family Plan World; 1993; 3(4):5, 26. PubMed ID: 12288089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Intrauterine contraception in women over 35-years old: comparison between copper and progesterone IUDs].
Calzolari E; Galoppi P; Masala L; Parisi C; Iannucci D; Salmaggi P; Custo GM; Zichella L
Patol Clin Ostet Ginecol; 1985; 13(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 12342024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. IUDs: current perspectives.
Hepburn S
Curr Ther (Seaforth); 1994 Oct; 35(10):49-55. PubMed ID: 12319352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
