180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12283661)
1. [General and structural changes in the social process of population reproduction in Poland up to the year 2000].
Lyatukh M
Naselenie; 1989; 7(4):52-62. PubMed ID: 12283661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Children in the contemporary Bulgarian family: few, enough, many].
Atanasov A
Naselenie; 1989; 7(4):69-73. PubMed ID: 12283663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Reproduction research (1981)].
Dvorak J; Srb V; Ales M
Demografie; 1983; 25(1):19-33. PubMed ID: 12279580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Research into natality in the Burgas district].
Zhekova V; Bogdanov Z
Naselenie; 1986; 4(1):54-66. PubMed ID: 12340833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [The course of the reproductive process in real cohorts].
Skretowicz B
Studia Demogr; 1986; 2(4/86):91-105. PubMed ID: 12314544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Natality and family models in Council of Europe countries and in France].
Zucker-rouvillois E
Rev Fr Aff Soc; 1987; 41(1):113-30. PubMed ID: 12177872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Fertility and demographic policy in Eastern Europe].
Festy P
Politiq Popul; 1986 Jul; 2(3):7-51. PubMed ID: 12341848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Nuptiality and fertility of minors in the Czech Socialist Republic].
Rychtarikova J
Demografie; 1986; 28(2):97-109. PubMed ID: 12314347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Family reproductive behavior in the Pernik district].
Minkov M; Kotzeva T; Sugareva M; Rizova G
Naselenie; 1986; 4(1):3-53. PubMed ID: 12340832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Demographic processes and problems in the Lovech area].
Minkov M
Naselenie; 1988; 6(3):3-21. PubMed ID: 12282746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Reproductive behavior and classification of factors from the standpoint of possibilities for regulation of the birth rate].
Ilieva N
Naselenie; 1989; 7(4):23-30. PubMed ID: 12283657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [The "price" of a child in the contemporary family].
Kotseva T
Naselenie; 1986; 4(3):43-52. PubMed ID: 12268186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Common features of population climate in the Czech and Slovak Republics in 1991.
Kolorosova J
Acta Univ Carol Geogr; 1993; 28(1):73-85. PubMed ID: 12291386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [The status and dynamics of fertility and mortality in Bulgaria].
Donkov K
Naselenie; 1985; 3(3):27-50. PubMed ID: 12314213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Fertility trends in Bulgaria (1960-1990)].
Filipov D
Naselenie; 1992; (1):72-84. PubMed ID: 12285153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Demographic behavior and family planning in Romania].
Mesarosh E
Naselenie; 1986; 4(1):83-93. PubMed ID: 12340835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [A new view on fertility developments during the years 1965-1980 in Bulgaria and Czechoslovakia].
Sugareva M; Rychtarikova J
Demografie; 1983; 25(4):326-33. PubMed ID: 12265726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Fertility prospects in Poland].
Smolinski Z
Wiad Stat (Warsaw); 1988 May; 33(5):1-4. PubMed ID: 12281380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Recent processes of population development in Czechoslovakia and their significance for geography].
Andrle A; Srb V
Geogr Cas; 1983; 35(1):32-49. PubMed ID: 12266455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Some new phenomena of culturally legitimate examples of family formation].
Mozny I
Demografie; 1987; 29(2):114-24. PubMed ID: 12268634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
