637 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12284064)
1. Economic woes mean cuts to family planning services.
Contracept Technol Update; 1991 Jul; 12(7):104, 109-10. PubMed ID: 12284064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. More family planning and abortion services needed.
Gold R
Plan Parent Rev; 1984; 3(4):5. PubMed ID: 12267090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A patchwork of funding sources for Norplant users in the U.S.
Antarsh L
AVSC News; 1992 Sep; 30(3):1-2. PubMed ID: 12285829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. From the world beyond Washington. The states and fertility-related laws: an analysis at mid-year.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1987 Aug; ():4-6. PubMed ID: 12281329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Public funding for U.S. contraceptive services down since 1980 -- $95 million a year goes to sterilization.
Sukop S
AVSC News; 1992 Mar; 30(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 12285114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Uniting to prevent unwanted pregnancies.
Lynch D
Sun; 1994 Feb; ():18A. PubMed ID: 12287871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Gag rule provision intact as conferees complete work on HHS funding bill. Abortion funding, parental notice dropped.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1991 Oct; (17):1-2. PubMed ID: 12284472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of publicly funded contraceptive services on unintended pregnancies and implications for Medicaid expenditures.
Forrest JD; Samara R
Fam Plann Perspect; 1996; 28(5):188-95. PubMed ID: 8886761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Title X may get 10% funding increase despite cutbacks for deficit.
Kaeser L
Contracept Technol Update; 1994 Apr; 15(4):53-4. PubMed ID: 12318753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Family planning services in the United States.
Morris L
Bull Pan Am Health Organ; 1975; 9(2):124-8. PubMed ID: 1156710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. School-based clinics combat teen pregnancy.
Contracept Technol Update; 1985 Apr; 6(4):53-7. PubMed ID: 12313867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Financing family planning services: is categorical legislation still needed?
Mcfarlane DR; Meier KJ
Am J Gynecol Health; 1991; 5(5-6):130-7. PubMed ID: 12344741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Title X family planning clinics confront escalating costs, increasing needs.
Dailard C
Guttmacher Rep Public Policy; 1999 Apr; 2(2):1-2, 14. PubMed ID: 12349122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Public funding for contraceptive, sterilization and abortion services, 1994.
Sollom T; Gold RB; Saul R
Fam Plann Perspect; 1996; 28(4):166-73. PubMed ID: 8853282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Title X program faces major upheaval as High Court okays ban on abortion speech.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1991 May; (9):1-4. PubMed ID: 12343265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Family planning and adoption promotion: new proposals, long-standing issues.
Dailard C
Guttmacher Rep Public Policy; 1999 Oct; 2(5):1-3, 13. PubMed ID: 12349385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. States continue to expand eligibility for family planning services under Medicaid.
Gold RB
State Reprod Health Monit; 1996 Sep; 7(3):3-5. PubMed ID: 12347484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. America's elderly: policy implications.
Barberis M
Popul Bull; 1981; 35(4 Supplement):1-13. PubMed ID: 12146279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Compliance with new ban means no mention of abortion.
Contracept Technol Update; 1991 Jul; 12(7):101-2. PubMed ID: 12284062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Culture and class as determinants of out-of-wedlock childbearing and poverty during late adolescence.
Sullivan ML
J Res Adolesc; 1993; 3(3):295-316. PubMed ID: 12345461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
