241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12284514)
1. House seeks restrictions on "bogus" abortion clinics.
Family Plan World; 1991; 1(2):2, 5. PubMed ID: 12284514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The right-to-life resurgence: recent victories push a struggling movement back to the forefront of the abortion battle.
Diconsiglio JM
Family Plan World; 1992; 2(1):9, 12-4. PubMed ID: 12317130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Gag rule provision intact as conferees complete work on HHS funding bill. Abortion funding, parental notice dropped.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1991 Oct; (17):1-2. PubMed ID: 12284472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Compliance with new ban means no mention of abortion.
Contracept Technol Update; 1991 Jul; 12(7):101-2. PubMed ID: 12284062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Women's responses to abortion: implications for post-abortion support groups.
Lodl KM; Mcgettigan A; Bucy J
J Soc Work Hum Sex; 1985; 3(2-3):119-32. PubMed ID: 12179640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Abortion providers seek to use RICO law as redress for clinic violence.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1993 Dec; (20):1-2. PubMed ID: 12319556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. High court hears clinic blockade case, as appeals court upholds abortion law.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1991 Oct; (17):2-3. PubMed ID: 12284473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Current legal trends regarding abortions for minors: a dilemma for counselors.
Talbutt LC
Sch Couns; 1983 Nov; 31(2):120-4. PubMed ID: 12313169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The uneasy case for a national law on abortion.
Correia EO
Am Prospect; 1991; (5):84-90. PubMed ID: 12285375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Act of 28 May 1987.
United States. Minnesota
Annu Rev Popul Law; 1987; 14():48-9. PubMed ID: 12346747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Family planning clinics share blame for men's failure to use services.
Contracept Technol Update; 1986 Jan; 7(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 12267617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. RICO, abortion and free speech.
Sun; 1994 Jan; ():10A. PubMed ID: 12287354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. "From the world beyond Washington".
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1993 Oct; (16):3-4. PubMed ID: 12318482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinton and appeals court signal death knell for Title X gag rule.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1992 Nov; (17):1-2. PubMed ID: 12344619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Title X program faces major upheaval as High Court okays ban on abortion speech.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1991 May; (9):1-4. PubMed ID: 12343265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Medical groups assert gag has not been lifted, ask Hill for outright repeal.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1992 Apr; (6):1, 3-4. PubMed ID: 12317222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. School-based clinics combat teen pregnancy.
Contracept Technol Update; 1985 Apr; 6(4):53-7. PubMed ID: 12313867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reproductive rights on firmer ground with prochoice White House, Congress. Special report -- abortion and the 1992 elections.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1992 Nov; (18):1-2. PubMed ID: 12285933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Decline in abortions looks like a trend.
Banisky S
Sun; 1994 Jun; ():1A, 17A. PubMed ID: 12287704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Abortion clinics win legal battle. Blockaders subject to anti-rackets law.
Denniston L; Banisky S
Sun; 1994 Jan; ():1A, 9A. PubMed ID: 12287355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
