625 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12285000)
1. The rise and fall and rise of the IUD.
Burnhill MS
Am J Gynecol Health; 1989; 3(3-S):6-10. PubMed ID: 12285000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reconsidering IUDs.
Goldberg B
AVSC News; 1992 Jul; 30(2):7-8. PubMed ID: 12285571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Suspension of IUD sales in the United States: what are the international implications?].
Ramirez FJ; Starrs AM
Perspect Int Planif Fam; 1987; (Spec No):28-34. PubMed ID: 12269049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [The end of IUD marketing in the United States: what does it mean for American women?].
Forrest JD
Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1987 Mar; 15(3):291-300. PubMed ID: 12341479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The IUD: dispelling the myths and assessing the potential.
Mishell Dr ; Sulak PJ
Dialogues Contracept; 1997; 5(2):1-4. PubMed ID: 12292543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. ParaGard gets mixed reviews at one-year anniversary.
Contracept Technol Update; 1989 Jul; 10(7):89-96. PubMed ID: 12282179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The intrauterine device today.
Rioux JE
J SOGC; 1993 Oct; 15(8):921-4. PubMed ID: 12318529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. IUDs struggle to shake off legacy of past.
Barron T
Family Plan World; 1992; 2(1):10-1, 31. PubMed ID: 12317120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. IUDs: current perspectives.
Hepburn S
Curr Ther (Seaforth); 1994 Oct; 35(10):49-55. PubMed ID: 12319352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intrauterine devices: an effective alternative to oral hormonal contraception.
Prescrire Int; 2009 Jun; 18(101):125-30. PubMed ID: 19637436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The new lineup of IUDs.
Family Plan World; 1992; 2(1):31. PubMed ID: 12317124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. IUDs no longer profitable in U.S. market.
Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1986; 7(3):4. PubMed ID: 12267948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Inserting IUDs safely.
Burnhill MS
Am J Gynecol Health; 1989; 3(3-S):11-6. PubMed ID: 12284992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. What we've learned about IUDs from the Women's Health Study.
Lee NC
Am J Gynecol Health; 1989; 3(3-S):27-32. PubMed ID: 12284996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. IUD litigation: the Planned Parenthood experience.
York SS
Am J Gynecol Health; 1989; 3(3-S):35-7. PubMed ID: 12284998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intrauterine devices.
Gromko L
Nurse Pract; 1980; 5(4):17,20-1, passim. PubMed ID: 7413110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The IUD: will its future always be crippled by its past?
Farr G
Family Plan World; 1993; 3(4):5, 26. PubMed ID: 12288089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Steroid intra-uterine contraception: progesterone-releasing devices. II. Insertion, clinical problems and contraceptive dependability].
Custo GM; Cosmi EV
Patol Clin Ostet Ginecol; 1984; 12(4):331-43. PubMed ID: 12340352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Acceptability of IUDs is increasing.
Finger WR; Barr D
Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1992 Oct; 13(2):27-30. PubMed ID: 12286082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Intrauterine contraception in women over 35-years old: comparison between copper and progesterone IUDs].
Calzolari E; Galoppi P; Masala L; Parisi C; Iannucci D; Salmaggi P; Custo GM; Zichella L
Patol Clin Ostet Ginecol; 1985; 13(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 12342024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
