718 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12285571)
1. Reconsidering IUDs.
Goldberg B
AVSC News; 1992 Jul; 30(2):7-8. PubMed ID: 12285571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Acceptability of IUDs is increasing.
Finger WR; Barr D
Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1992 Oct; 13(2):27-30. PubMed ID: 12286082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intrauterine devices. The optimal long-term contraceptive method?
Fortney JA; Feldblum PJ; Raymond EG
J Reprod Med; 1999 Mar; 44(3):269-74. PubMed ID: 10202746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The rise and fall and rise of the IUD.
Burnhill MS
Am J Gynecol Health; 1989; 3(3-S):6-10. PubMed ID: 12285000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intrauterine devices: an effective alternative to oral hormonal contraception.
Prescrire Int; 2009 Jun; 18(101):125-30. PubMed ID: 19637436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The IUD: dispelling the myths and assessing the potential.
Mishell Dr ; Sulak PJ
Dialogues Contracept; 1997; 5(2):1-4. PubMed ID: 12292543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A tale of four IUDs: newest devices billed as '90s sensations.
Family Plan World; 1993; 3(4):19. PubMed ID: 12288086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The IUD: will its future always be crippled by its past?
Farr G
Family Plan World; 1993; 3(4):5, 26. PubMed ID: 12288089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of IUDs in developing countries: a comparative study.
Farr G; Burdan A
Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1991 Sep; 12(2):6-8, 12. PubMed ID: 12284280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [The end of IUD marketing in the United States: what does it mean for American women?].
Forrest JD
Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1987 Mar; 15(3):291-300. PubMed ID: 12341479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. IUDs struggle to shake off legacy of past.
Barron T
Family Plan World; 1992; 2(1):10-1, 31. PubMed ID: 12317120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. IUDs: current perspectives.
Hepburn S
Curr Ther (Seaforth); 1994 Oct; 35(10):49-55. PubMed ID: 12319352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [IUDs and ectopic pregnancy].
Sivin I
Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1983 Dec; 11(12):1287-94. PubMed ID: 12312723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. IUDs and PID: understanding the American situation.
Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1987; 8(2):8. PubMed ID: 12268660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Today's IUDs offer safe, effective contraception.
Finger WR
Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1993 Mar; 13(3):12-5. PubMed ID: 12318094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The intrauterine device today.
Rioux JE
J SOGC; 1993 Oct; 15(8):921-4. PubMed ID: 12318529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performances of copper T 380A and multiload copper 375/250 intrauterine contraceptive devices in a comparative clinical trial.
Arowojolu AO; Otolorin EO; Ladipo OA
Afr J Med Med Sci; 1995 Mar; 24(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 7495202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The rise and fall of IUDS's: banning of IUD's in USA. Alarming interactions between IUD's and sexually transmitted diseases (STD).
Krzyzaniak LT; Lotfy M
Adv Contracept Deliv Syst; 1986 Jun; 2(2-3):112-58. PubMed ID: 12280505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. New studies link IUDs, infertility; say copper devices safer.
Contracept Technol Update; 1985 Jun; 6(6):81-3. PubMed ID: 12313655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intrauterine contraception.
Reinprayoon D
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Aug; 4(4):527-30. PubMed ID: 1324024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]