2285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12286287)
1. Court lifts ban on enforcing Miss. anti-abortion law.
Denniston L
Sun; 1992 Aug; ():3A. PubMed ID: 12286287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Abortion foes get turn to ask Supreme Court for constitutional protection.
Denniston L
Sun; 1994 Apr; ():10A. PubMed ID: 12287661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bare court majority reaffirms Roe, but standard for reviewing state laws is relaxed.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1992 Jul; (11):1-3. PubMed ID: 12286280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. High court gives states more freedom to require consent in teen abortions.
Denniston L
Sun; 1993 Nov; ():3A. PubMed ID: 12345223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. High court hears clinic blockade case, as appeals court upholds abortion law.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1991 Oct; (17):2-3. PubMed ID: 12284473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Appeals court finds Utah late abortion restrictions unconstitutional.
Reprod Freedom News; 1995 Sep; 4(16):2. PubMed ID: 12320245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. New abortion laws introduce informed and parental consent.
Family Plan World; 1991; 1(2):25. PubMed ID: 12284517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Supreme Court refuses to review clinic access law; Second Appeals Court upholds statute.
Reprod Freedom News; 1995 Jun; 4(13):2-3. PubMed ID: 12346292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Supreme Court issues limited ruling in challenge to Utah abortion ban.
Reprod Freedom News; 1996 Jun; 5(11):2. PubMed ID: 12291525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Roe v. Wade. Revisiting the fundamentals.
Benshoof J
Conscience; 1998; 18(4):16-7. PubMed ID: 12178876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.
Sayeed SA
Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Title X program faces major upheaval as High Court okays ban on abortion speech.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1991 May; (9):1-4. PubMed ID: 12343265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Abortion providers seek to use RICO law as redress for clinic violence.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1993 Dec; (20):1-2. PubMed ID: 12319556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Supreme Court bars mandatory parental role in minors' abortions.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1979 Aug; 8(4):37-9. PubMed ID: 12278191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. From the world beyond Washington. The states and fertility-related laws: an analysis at mid-year.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1987 Aug; ():4-6. PubMed ID: 12281329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Court reaffirms Roe but upholds restrictions.
Fam Plann Perspect; 1992; 24(4):174-7, 185. PubMed ID: 1526274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Legal aspects of abortion practice.
Goldman EB
Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1986 Mar; 13(1):135-43. PubMed ID: 3709009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. U.S. abortion policy since Roe v. Wade.
Mcfarlane DR
Am J Gynecol Health; 1993; 7(4):98-106. PubMed ID: 12288251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Milwaukee story: a public hospital's resistance to the Supreme Court abortion rulings.
Ambrose L
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1975 Aug; 4(4):68-72. PubMed ID: 12334289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. State court finds Michigan mandatory delay law unconstitutional.
Reprod Freedom News; 1994 Jul; 3(14):2-3. PubMed ID: 12287945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
