418 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12286381)
21. The politics of prevention. Safe sex.
Asiaweek; 1993 Mar; 19(9):40-1. PubMed ID: 12286333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Natural family planning: can it work?
Shivanandan M
Marriage Fam Living; 1976 Nov; 58(11):9-11. PubMed ID: 12266169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Natural family planning in the Philippines.
Laing JE
Stud Fam Plann; 1984; 15(2):49-61. PubMed ID: 6710549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The participation of non-governmental organizations in the Philippine population program.
Philippines. Commission on Population. Population Policy Analysis and Coordination Unit
Popul Bull; 1989; (9):1-6. PubMed ID: 12290514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Visible changes. Family planning in the Philippines regains its role as a key program in national development.
Taniguchi H
Integration; 1993 Mar; (35):2-3. PubMed ID: 12286370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Philippine population policy: quo vadis?
Carino LV
People Count; 1994 Jun; 4(5):1-4. PubMed ID: 12179229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comprehensive services at Fabella Center.
De Los Reyes RR
Initiatives Popul; 1983; 7(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 12265794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. More about natural family planning.
Gallagher J
Aust Fam Physician; 1983 Nov; 12(11):786-92. PubMed ID: 6667188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Bataenos' voice on family planning.
Sortido VC
Rural Reconstr Forum; 1994; (15):23-5. PubMed ID: 12289016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Man's limitations. The Catholic view.
Bacani T
Asiaweek; 1993 Oct; ():52. PubMed ID: 12345271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The new politics of natural family planning.
Johnson JH; Reich J
Fam Plann Perspect; 1986; 18(6):277-8,281-2. PubMed ID: 3817124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Promising. Quality of care.
Eleserio GL
Integration; 1998; (55):19-21. PubMed ID: 12294070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Diocesan-wide NFP program reaches broad population groups.
Hosp Prog; 1984 Apr; 65(4):26, 28, 30. PubMed ID: 10265815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. USA President Clinton acts to ensure reproductive health.
IPPF Open File; 1993 Feb; ():1. PubMed ID: 12286731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Devolution. How will the family planning program be affected when local governments get greater autonomy?
Nuguid NA
Integration; 1993 Mar; (35):26-7. PubMed ID: 12286373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The dynamics of contraceptive adoption in Bohol, Philippines: 1976-1978.
Reynes JF
Philipp Popul J; 1988; 4(1-4):23-37. PubMed ID: 12317185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [The new policies of natural birth control].
Johnson JH; Reich J
Perspect Internation Plan Fam; 1986; (Special):27-31. PubMed ID: 12280673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. NFP offers user-control, but requires discipline. Contraceptive update.
Barnett B
Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1996; 17(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 12320444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Developing more effective family planning, family health and family welfare programmes: opportunities for government-NGO collaboration. Executive summary and policy implications.
Donaldson PJ; Cernada GP
Popul Res Leads; 1992; (42):1-2. PubMed ID: 12286306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Bishops on birth control: a chronicle of obstruction.
Shannon D
Conscience; 1991; 12(6):14-7. PubMed ID: 12178852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
