314 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12288300)
1. 2 states sued for not paying for abortions for poor.
Denniston L
Sun; 1994 Apr; ():3A. PubMed ID: 12288300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Illinois, Massachusetts: governors veto restrictions on state funds for abortion.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1977 Oct; 6(5):57-9. PubMed ID: 12308832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Colorado rejects regulations to limit Medicaid coverage for abortion.
Reprod Freedom News; 1994 May; 3(10):5-6. PubMed ID: 12319329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. States, Congress confront abortion services under Medicaid, health care plan.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1994 Jan; (1):3-4. PubMed ID: 12345518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Additional states sued for non-compliance with Medicaid law.
Reprod Freedom News; 1994 Apr; 3(7):3. PubMed ID: 12318699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Grant recipients' rights in question.
Willson PD
Plan Parent Rev; 1984; 4(1):13-4. PubMed ID: 12266274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. High court urged to reject Colorado appeal of finding that it must fund rape and incest survivors' abortions.
Reprod Freedom News; 1995 Nov; 4(20):2. PubMed ID: 12320281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Veto -- or threat thereof -- prevails over majority as 102nd Congress adjourns.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1992 Oct; (15):2-4. PubMed ID: 12317790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Federal court rules on Hyde Amendment in Michigan case.
Reprod Freedom News; 1994 Jul; 3(14):2. PubMed ID: 12287944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Senate, 59-40, defeats move to strike limits on Medicaid abortion coverage.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1993 Oct; (15):1-2. PubMed ID: 12286980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Coverage of abortion controversial in both public and private plans.
Sollom T
State Reprod Health Monit; 1996 Sep; 7(3):5-6. PubMed ID: 12347485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Restrictions on Medicaid abortions open to challenge on state constitutional grounds.
Klassel D
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1980 Dec; 9(6):95-8. PubMed ID: 12262416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Utah's ban on abortion coverage for low-income women challenged.
Reprod Freedom News; 1995 Feb; 4(3):2. PubMed ID: 12319148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. District of Columbia money bill faces last-minute antiabortion challenge.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1993 Oct; (16):1-2. PubMed ID: 12318480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. States rebel against Federal abortion orders.
Kent C; Tokarski C
J Am Health Policy; 1994; 4(2):6-7. PubMed ID: 10132602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Abortion and Medicaid: courts reject limits on funding medically necessary procedures.
Kalivoda P
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1979 Dec; 8(6):80-4. PubMed ID: 12278416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. House vote on Hyde changes dynamic of Congressional abortion debate.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1993 Jul; (12):1-2. PubMed ID: 12286695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Family planning funds increased tenfold since FY 1971 while staff remained constant.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1977 Oct; 6(5):62-5. PubMed ID: 12308833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Minnesota court overturns ban on Medicaid coverage for abortion.
Reprod Freedom News; 1994 Jun; 3(12):3. PubMed ID: 12345511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Public funding of abortions and abortion counseling for poor women.
Edwards RB
Adv Bioeth; 1997; 2():303-34. PubMed ID: 12348330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
