309 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12289416)
21. Attorney-General (QLD) v. Parents, In re S.
Australia. Family Court
Fed Law Rep; 1989 Nov; 98():41-56. PubMed ID: 12041104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. F. v. West Berkshire Health Authority, 2 December 1988.
United Kingdom. High Court
Annu Rev Popul Law; 1988; 15():25. PubMed ID: 12289510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. In re X, June 1987.
United Kingdom. High Court
Annu Rev Popul Law; 1987; 14():41. PubMed ID: 12346722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Matter of Moe.
Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court, Worcester
North East Rep Second Ser; 1982 Mar; 432():712-24. PubMed ID: 12041253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. In Re Doe, 12 November 1987.
United States. Rhode Island. Supreme Court
Annu Rev Popul Law; 1987; 14():50. PubMed ID: 12346752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A national sterilization policy: no consensus, especially for the mentally incompetent.
Hart DS
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1978 Jun; 7(3):45-9. PubMed ID: 12260349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Sterilization of mentally retarded persons.
Van der Merwe JV; Roux JP
Obstet Gynecol Surv; 1987 Aug; 42(8):489-93. PubMed ID: 3627575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The international medicolegal status of sterilization for mentally handicapped people.
Gonzales B
J Reprod Med; 1982 May; 27(5):257-8. PubMed ID: 7108860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Maintenance responsibility for a child resulting from an unsuccessful sterilization, no damage].
Germany, Federal Republic of
Neue Jurist Wochenschr; 1978; 31():1685-7. PubMed ID: 12338428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Petrunic and Anor. v. Barnes, 1 February 1988.
Australia. Victoria. Supreme Court
Annu Rev Popul Law; 1988; 15():22. PubMed ID: 12289437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Wentzel v. Montgomery General Hospital, Inc.
Maryland. Court of Appeals
Atl Report; 1982 Jul; 447():1244-64. PubMed ID: 11648524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effect of the Human Genome Initiative on women's rights and reproductive decisions.
Charo RA
Fetal Diagn Ther; 1993 Apr; 8(Suppl. 1):148-59. PubMed ID: 11653014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Ruby v. Massey. 16 May 1978.
U.S. District Court, D. Connecticut
Fed Suppl; 1978; 452():361-72. PubMed ID: 11646083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Sterilization of mentally retarded girls].
Lenard HG; Müller K
Gynakologe; 1991 Apr; 24(2):87-90. PubMed ID: 1743571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Re K and Public Trustee.
Canada. British Columbia. Court of Appeal
Dom Law Rep; 1985 May; 19():255-85. PubMed ID: 12041079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Re D (A Minor) (Wardship:Sterilisation).
Great Britain. England. High Court of Justice, Family Division
All Engl Law Rep; 1975 Sep; 1976():326-36. PubMed ID: 11648637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Voluntary sterilization of a 34-year-old woman with 3 children is not against the law].
Germany, Federal Republic of. Oberstes Bundesgericht
Entscheid Bundesgerichtshofes Zivilsachen; 1976; 67():48-56. PubMed ID: 12311976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Capacity, competence, consent: voluntary sterilization of the mentally retarded.
Neuwirth GS; Heisler PA; Goldrich KS
Columbia Human Rights Law Rev; 1974 Fall-1975 Winter; 6(2):447-72. PubMed ID: 11663600
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. In re Moe.
Massachusetts. Appeals Court, Plymouth
North East Rep Second Ser; 1991 Oct; 579():682-7. PubMed ID: 12041236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Contraceptive vasectomy: does it have a future in France?].
Arvis G
Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1986 Mar; 14(3):289-93. PubMed ID: 12268062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
