321 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12290563)
1. Implanted protection. Women slowly turn to Norplant use.
Kobren G
Sun; 1991 Jul; ():1C, 5C. PubMed ID: 12290563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hearing focuses on price of Norplant; Wyeth pledges discount for public sector.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1993 Nov; (18):3-4. PubMed ID: 12318533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. City officials planning to promote Norplant.
Banisky S
Sun; 1992 Dec; ():1A, 11A. PubMed ID: 12317958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A patchwork of funding sources for Norplant users in the U.S.
Antarsh L
AVSC News; 1992 Sep; 30(3):1-2. PubMed ID: 12285829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinics: Norplant cost chokes services.
Family Plan World; 1993; 3(5):1, 28. PubMed ID: 12319135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Wyeth-Ayerst to reduce U.S. price of Norplant implants, but not until December 1995. Family planners outraged.
Contracept Technol Update; 1994 Jan; 15(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 12319213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. IMAP statement on Norplant subdermal contraceptive implant system.
International Planned Parenthood Federation IPPF. International Medical Advisory Panel IMAP
IPPF Med Bull; 1993 Apr; 27(2):1-3. PubMed ID: 12345306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Norplant.
McIntyre PS
J Tenn Med Assoc; 1992 Jul; 85(7):333-4. PubMed ID: 1625459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinicians, patients, Medicaid: is anyone to blame for Norplant removal dilemma? Part II.
Contracept Technol Update; 1993 Oct; 14(10):149-53. PubMed ID: 12286902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Norplant contraceptive method gains ground. Approved for distribution in the United States].
Pop Sahel; 1990 Dec; (15):55-6. PubMed ID: 12283990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Injectable and implantable contraceptives.
Cullins VE
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Aug; 4(4):536-43. PubMed ID: 1387011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Insertion and removal of Norplant].
Townsend S
Netw Fr; 1991 May; 6(1):8-9. PubMed ID: 12319670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Subdermal contraceptive implants in nurse-midwifery practice.
Emerling JM; Paluzzi P; Leiva J; Cullins VE
J Nurse Midwifery; 1993; 38(2 Suppl):80S-87S. PubMed ID: 8483013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Norplant debate: dollars v. sense. Is Norplant discount in U.S. too little, too late?
Family Plan World; 1994; 4(1):1, 12. PubMed ID: 12318850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Special report... Norplant -- one year later.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1991 Dec; (20):1, 3. PubMed ID: 12343466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. NORPLANT contraceptive implants advancing.
Segal SJ
Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1984; 5(3):1-3. PubMed ID: 12279797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Norplant system: an effective, long term contraceptive of the 20th century.
Merino G; Murrieta S; Moran C; Hafez ES
Adv Contracept Deliv Syst; 1994; 10(3-4):217-34. PubMed ID: 12287840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Choosing a contraceptive. What's best for you?
Anthony J
Am Health; 1994 Apr; 13(3):68-71. PubMed ID: 12290558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Norplant may be too costly for low income women.
Family Plan World; 1991; ():7, 14. PubMed ID: 12346943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Arrival of Norplant may be bittersweet for clinics.
Contracept Technol Update; 1991 Jan; 12(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 12283523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
