156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12291557)
1. Report calls for new revolution in contraceptive technology.
Durbin S
Popul Today; 1996 Sep; 24(9):1-2. PubMed ID: 12291557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Contraceptive development--the view from the U.S.A. in the mid 80s].
Potts M; Siemens A; Burton N
Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1986 Mar; 14(3):247-51. PubMed ID: 12268061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Introducing new contraceptives.
Segal SJ; Coutinho E
Draper Fund Rep; 1986 Dec; (15):27-32. PubMed ID: 12341234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Contraceptive research: still inadequate after all these years?
Diconsiglio JM
Family Plan World; 1992; 2(6):14. PubMed ID: 12344623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. FDA opens door for emergency contraception.
Landovitz K
AVSC News; 1997; 35(2):7. PubMed ID: 12294488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Special report: the truth about condoms. Barriers to better condom "killing people"; regulatory, political hurdles stifle development.
Contracept Technol Update; 1995 Jan; 16(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 12319318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. FDA panels probe efficacy of barrier contraceptives.
Turnbull W
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1996 Dec; (10):3-4. PubMed ID: 12291983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Contraceptive development: why the snail's pace?
Kaeser L
Fam Plann Perspect; 1990; 22(3):131-3. PubMed ID: 2379571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. FDA review panel gives thumbs up to Norplant.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1989 May; ():3-5. PubMed ID: 12290752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Contraception in the USA--an unfavourable climate.
Tyrer L
IPPF Med Bull; 1986 Aug; 20(4):1-3. PubMed ID: 12340838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. New Advantage 24 contraceptive gel claims 24-hour effectiveness. But proposed FDA rule could put N-9 products to the test.
Contracept Technol Update; 1995 Apr; 16(4):45-9. PubMed ID: 12347026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Should oral contraceptives be sold over-the-counter?
Stone SC
Am J Gynecol Health; 1993; 7(2):27-32. PubMed ID: 12319537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Spermicide effects questioned by FDA panel.
AIDS Wkly Plus; 1996 Dec; ():8. PubMed ID: 12320492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Direct-to-consumer advertising affects provider / patient relationship.
Contracept Technol Update; 1998 Dec; 19(12):153-5. PubMed ID: 12321805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. New year, new option: Cyclo-Provera awaits word.
Contracept Technol Update; 1998 Jan; 19(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 12348212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. OTC spermicides: how helpful in STD prevention?
Contracept Technol Update; 1997 Mar; 18(3):29-30. PubMed ID: 12292551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Barriers to EC access continue to fall.
Contracept Technol Update; 1997 Nov; 18(11):142-3. PubMed ID: 12292771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. FemCap in Germany, seeking U.S. approval.
Contracept Technol Update; 2000 Mar; 21(3):35-6. PubMed ID: 12349551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The wait for a monthly combined hormonal injectable may be over soon.
Contracept Technol Update; 1999 Nov; 20(11):125-7. PubMed ID: 12295326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hearing focuses on price of Norplant; Wyeth pledges discount for public sector.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1993 Nov; (18):3-4. PubMed ID: 12318533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]