These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1229513)

  • 1. [Ferrokinetic studies in patients with Björk-Shiley heart valve prostheses].
    Glaubitt D; Thormann I; Schmutzler H; Swierzinski R
    Verh Dtsch Ges Inn Med; 1975; 81():265-9. PubMed ID: 1229513
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mechanical valves: a comparative analysis of the Starr-Edwards and Björk-Shiley prostheses.
    Murphy DA; Levine FH; Buckley MJ; Swinski L; Daggett WM; Akins CW; Austen WG
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1983 Nov; 86(5):746-52. PubMed ID: 6632948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Late complications following Björk-Shiley and St. Jude Medical heart valve replacement].
    Horstkotte D; Körfer R; Budde T; Haerten K; Schulte HD; Bircks W; Loogen F
    Z Kardiol; 1983 May; 72(5):251-61. PubMed ID: 6880335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clotted Bjork-Shiley mitral valve prostheses: early detection and surgical management.
    Sabbagh AH
    Cardiovasc Res Cent Bull; 1983; 21(4):101-7. PubMed ID: 6883419
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Mechanical hemolysis in patients with mitral and aortic valve prostheses].
    Il'ina VE; Samuilova DSh; Seĭsenbaev MB
    Vestn Khir Im I I Grek; 1986 Jun; 136(6):12-6. PubMed ID: 3750702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Hemolysis in patients with heart valve prostheses. Comparison between Björk-Shiley and Saint-Jude Medical valves].
    Ferrière M; Saussine M; Delpech S; Dinal D; Nègre G; Coulon P; Blanchet P; Latour H
    Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1985 Aug; 78(8):1243-8. PubMed ID: 3935084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Effect of valve type and valve function on chronic intravascular hemolysis after alloprosthetic mitral and aortic valve replacement].
    Horstkotte D; Aul C; Seipel L; Körfer R; Budde T; Schulte HD; Bircks W; Loogen F
    Z Kardiol; 1983 Feb; 72(2):119-31. PubMed ID: 6845808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mechanical failure of the Björk-Shiley valve. Incidence, clinical presentation, and management.
    Lindblom D; Björk VO; Semb BK
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1986 Nov; 92(5):894-907. PubMed ID: 3773546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long-term follow-up of patients who underwent single valve replacement with Björk-Shiley prosthesis.
    Bharadwaj B; Wall R; Nutting S
    Can J Surg; 1980 Mar; 23(2):183-6. PubMed ID: 7363182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Late results of valve replacement with the Björk-Shiley valve (1973 to 1982).
    Orszulak TA; Schaff HV; DeSmet JM; Danielson GK; Pluth JR; Puga FJ
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1993 Feb; 105(2):302-12. PubMed ID: 8429659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Long-term follow-up of aortic or mitral valve replacement. Comparison of results following implantation of a mechanical or biological artificial valve].
    Mudra H; Rudolph W
    Herz; 1986 Apr; 11(2):97-115. PubMed ID: 3699678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of long-term clinical follow-up after aortic or mitral valve replacement with Björk-Shiley tilting disc prostheses or tissue valves.
    Mudra H; Kraus F; Wellnhofer E; Hall D; Rudolph W
    Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():277-81. PubMed ID: 3727700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Chronic hemolysis in patients with ball-valve prostheses.
    Andersen MN; Gabrieli E; Zizzi JA
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1965 Oct; 50(4):501-10. PubMed ID: 5835500
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative clinical results with Omniscience (STM1), Medtronic-Hall, and Björk-Shiley convexo-concave (70 degrees) prostheses in mitral valve replacement.
    Cortina JM; Martinell J; Artiz V; Fraile J; Rábago G
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1986 Feb; 91(2):174-83. PubMed ID: 3945084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fourteen years' experience with the Björk-Shiley tilting disc prosthesis.
    Sethia B; Turner MA; Lewis S; Rodger RA; Bain WH
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1986 Mar; 91(3):350-61. PubMed ID: 3951241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Non-invasive determination of pressure gradients of heart valve prostheses using Doppler ultrasound].
    Hoffmann A; Amann FW; Grädel E; Burckhardt D
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1982 Nov; 112(45):1600-3. PubMed ID: 7156956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mitral valve replacement with the Björk-Shiley tilting-disc prosthesis.
    Messmer BJ; Okies JE; Hallman GL; Cooley DA
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1971 Dec; 62(6):938-46. PubMed ID: 4942974
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Björk-Shiley valve prosthesis. Analysis of long-term evolution.
    Alvarez L; Escudero C; Figuera D; Castillo-Olivares JL
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1992 Nov; 104(5):1249-58. PubMed ID: 1434701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hemolysis in mechanical bileaflet prostheses: experience with the Bicarbon valve.
    Josa M; Castellá M; Paré C; Bedini JL; Cartañá R; Mestres CA; Pomar JL; Mulet J
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2006 Apr; 81(4):1291-6. PubMed ID: 16564260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Thrombosis of the Björk-Shiley prosthesis: illustrative cases and review of the literature.
    Wright JO; Hiratzka LF; Brandt B; Doty DB
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1982 Jul; 84(1):138-44. PubMed ID: 7087530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.