These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1229558)
1. [Error possibilities in the determination of normal values based on biologic variance]. Kreutz FH Verh Dtsch Ges Inn Med; 1975; 81():529-33. PubMed ID: 1229558 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Proceedings: Possibility of errors in the determination of normal ranges, based on biological variance]. Kreutz FH MMW Munch Med Wochenschr; 1975 May; 117(20):847. PubMed ID: 805995 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Reliability of clinical chemical and hematologic laboratory analysis]. Bürgi W Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1972 Mar; 102(11):367-74. PubMed ID: 5033618 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. How total error can save time and money for the lab. Brooks Z; Massarella G; Plaut D MLO Med Lab Obs; 1994 Nov; 26(11):48, 50, 52-4. PubMed ID: 10172159 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The normal range. Pope RS Nurse Pract Forum; 1998 Mar; 9(1):24-5. PubMed ID: 9624973 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [The true error and the attributed error: analysis of the causes and remedies from specimen collection to response]. Lisi B; Bazzanella F; Latini P; Neri I; Pertosa M; Martin P Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1978 Jun; 14(2):197-212. PubMed ID: 751096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Estimating the error rates of diagnostic tests. Hui SL; Walter SD Biometrics; 1980 Mar; 36(1):167-71. PubMed ID: 7370371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Symposium: Determination of the normal value in the fields of clinical hematology and biochemistry]. Rinsho Byori; 1969 Apr; 17(4):299-302. PubMed ID: 5817563 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Great number of non-recorded cases of analytical interference. Unexpected and misinterpreted laboratory levels can result in diagnostic and therapeutic errors]. Lindstedt G; Ekman R; Forberg R; Isaksson A; Stridsberg M; Hård L; Nordin G; Nyström E Lakartidningen; 2002 May; 99(22):2492-4. PubMed ID: 12092048 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Use of statistical parameters for determining the distribution of random errors in laboratory practice]. Makarovskiĭ VV; Titova IA; Mikhaĭlov SV; Shafranskiĭ IuA; Ermakova EA Lab Delo; 1985; (1):54-6. PubMed ID: 2579279 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Frequent errors in laboratory studies]. Gabsch HC Z Med Labortech; 1975; 16(6 suppl):1-22. PubMed ID: 1226950 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [The relationship of analytic to biological variance--consequences for diagnosis and for the choice of laboratory tests]. Menschikow WW; Kreines MG; Delektorskaja LN; Pimenowa LM; Kadaschewa OG; Irrgang B Z Med Lab Diagn; 1989; 30(7):364-8. PubMed ID: 2603457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reproducibility and accuracy of clinical laboratory determinations. Flokstra JH; Varley AB; Hagans JA Am J Med Sci; 1966 Jun; 251(6):646-55. PubMed ID: 5946364 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Laboratory errors as judged by test request slips and test reports. Siddiqui S J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2006 Feb; 16(2):136-8. PubMed ID: 16499809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [A protective network for catching misleading laboratory results is required]. Theodorsson E Lakartidningen; 2002 May; 99(22):2489. PubMed ID: 12092047 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Resolving discordant samples in clinical laboratory practice. Datta P MLO Med Lab Obs; 2004 Nov; 36(11):28-31. PubMed ID: 15566111 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [An internal quality control system for the detection of clinically significant analytical errors]. Ruokonen A Duodecim; 1986; 102(9):579-85. PubMed ID: 3720595 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]