113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12296760)
1. Number of levels needed for diagnosis of cervical biopsies.
Luo YV; Prihoda TJ; Sharkey FE
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2002 Oct; 126(10):1205-8. PubMed ID: 12296760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Agreement and error rates using blinded review to evaluate surgical pathology of biopsy material.
Renshaw AA; Cartagena N; Granter SR; Gould EW
Am J Clin Pathol; 2003 Jun; 119(6):797-800. PubMed ID: 12817425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Measuring the value of review of pathology material by a second pathologist.
Renshaw AA; Gould EW
Am J Clin Pathol; 2006 May; 125(5):737-9. PubMed ID: 16707375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interpretation of skin biopsies by general pathologists: diagnostic discrepancy rate measured by blinded review.
Trotter MJ; Bruecks AK
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2003 Nov; 127(11):1489-92. PubMed ID: 14567717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mammographically directed breast biopsies: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of clinical physician expectations and of specimen handling and reporting characteristics in 434 institutions.
Nakhleh RE; Jones B; Zarbo RJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Jan; 121(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 9111087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Substantial Interobserver Agreement in the Diagnosis of Dysplasia in Barrett Esophagus Upon Review of a Patient's Entire Set of Biopsies.
Salomao MA; Lam-Himlin D; Pai RK
Am J Surg Pathol; 2018 Mar; 42(3):376-381. PubMed ID: 29135518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intralaboratory timeliness of surgical pathology reports. Results of two College of American Pathologists Q-Probes studies of biopsies and complex specimens.
Zarbo RJ; Gephardt GN; Howanitz PJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1996 Mar; 120(3):234-44. PubMed ID: 8629897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Study of amended reports to evaluate and improve surgical pathology processes.
Meier FA; Varney RC; Zarbo RJ
Adv Anat Pathol; 2011 Sep; 18(5):406-13. PubMed ID: 21841408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Greater interobserver agreement by endoscopic mucosal resection than biopsy samples in Barrett's dysplasia.
Wani S; Mathur SC; Curvers WL; Singh V; Alvarez Herrero L; Hall SB; Ulusarac O; Cherian R; McGregor DH; Bansal A; Rastogi A; Ahmed B; Singh M; Gaddam S; Ten Kate FJ; Bergman J; Sharma P
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2010 Sep; 8(9):783-8. PubMed ID: 20472096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Papanicolaou smear discrepancy: resolution by review.
Cline MK; Baxley EG; Montgomery RP
J Am Board Fam Pract; 1994; 7(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 8135142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of a new method in reaching consensus on the cause of cytologic-histologic correlation discrepancy.
Raab SS; Stone CH; Wojcik EM; Geisinger KR; Dahmoush L; Garcia FU; Grzybicki DM; Janosky JE; Meier FA; Zarbo RJ
Am J Clin Pathol; 2006 Dec; 126(6):836-42. PubMed ID: 17074685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [A method of determination of the accuracy of morphological diagnosis of surgical and biopsy material].
Gribunov IuP; Perov IuL; Frank GA; Khodasevich LS
Arkh Patol; 2004; 66(6):51-4. PubMed ID: 15648169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Changing Dermatopathology Protocols for Processing Small Skin Biopsies: Decreases in Slide Quantity Does Not Affect Patient Care and Allows for Optimal Efficiency.
Mudaliar K; Speiser J; Hutchens KA
Am J Dermatopathol; 2016 Jun; 38(6):409-12. PubMed ID: 27101126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Papillary lesions of the breast: impact of breast pathology subspecialization on core biopsy and excision diagnoses.
Jakate K; De Brot M; Goldberg F; Muradali D; O'Malley FP; Mulligan AM
Am J Surg Pathol; 2012 Apr; 36(4):544-51. PubMed ID: 22314186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Second opinion and discrepancy in the diagnosis of soft tissue lesions at surgical pathology.
Sharif MA; Hamdani SN
Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2010; 53(3):460-4. PubMed ID: 20699503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Rate of occult specimen provenance complications in routine clinical practice.
Pfeifer JD; Liu J
Am J Clin Pathol; 2013 Jan; 139(1):93-100. PubMed ID: 23270904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Correlation of workload with disagreement and amendment rates in surgical pathology and nongynecologic cytology.
Renshaw AA; Gould EW
Am J Clin Pathol; 2006 Jun; 125(6):820-2. PubMed ID: 16690479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Blinded review as a method for quality improvement in surgical pathology.
Renshaw AA; Pinnar NE; Jiroutek MR; Young ML
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2002 Aug; 126(8):961-3. PubMed ID: 12171496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma in Japan and the United States.
Oyama T; Allsbrook WC; Kurokawa K; Matsuda H; Segawa A; Sano T; Suzuki K; Epstein JI
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2005 Aug; 129(8):1004-10. PubMed ID: 16048389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Extraneous tissue: a potential source for diagnostic error in surgical pathology.
Layfield LJ; Witt BL; Metzger KG; Anderson GM
Am J Clin Pathol; 2011 Nov; 136(5):767-72. PubMed ID: 22031316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
