137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12297974)
1. Computed tomography diagnosis utilizing compressed image data: an ROC analysis using acute appendicitis as a model.
Megibow AJ; Rusinek H; Lisi V; Bennett GL; Macari M; Israel GM; Krinsky GA
J Digit Imaging; 2002 Jun; 15(2):84-90. PubMed ID: 12297974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Detection of subtle abnormalities on chest radiographs after irreversible compression.
Savcenko V; Erickson BJ; Palisson PM; Persons KR; Manduca A; Hartman TE; Harms GF; Brown LR
Radiology; 1998 Mar; 206(3):609-16. PubMed ID: 9494474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Abdominal 64-MDCT for suspected appendicitis: the use of oral and IV contrast material versus IV contrast material only.
Anderson SW; Soto JA; Lucey BC; Ozonoff A; Jordan JD; Ratevosian J; Ulrich AS; Rathlev NK; Mitchell PM; Rebholz C; Feldman JA; Rhea JT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Nov; 193(5):1282-8. PubMed ID: 19843742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Wavelet compression of low-dose chest CT data: effect on lung nodule detection.
Ko JP; Rusinek H; Naidich DP; McGuinness G; Rubinowitz AN; Leitman BS; Martino JM
Radiology; 2003 Jul; 228(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 12775850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Neutral vs positive oral contrast in diagnosing acute appendicitis with contrast-enhanced CT: sensitivity, specificity, reader confidence and interpretation time.
Naeger DM; Chang SD; Kolli P; Shah V; Huang W; Thoeni RF
Br J Radiol; 2011 May; 84(1001):418-26. PubMed ID: 20959365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Wavelet compression on detection of brain lesions with magnetic resonance imaging.
Terae S; Miyasaka K; Kudoh K; Nambu T; Shimizu T; Kaneko K; Yoshikawa H; Kishimoto R; Omatsu T; Fujita N
J Digit Imaging; 2000 Nov; 13(4):178-90. PubMed ID: 11110257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Image compression and chest radiograph interpretation: image perception comparison between uncompressed chest radiographs and chest radiographs stored using 10:1 JPEG compression.
Beall DP; Shelton PD; Kinsey TV; Horton MC; Fortman BJ; Achenbach S; Smirnoff V; Courneya DL; Carpenter B; Gironda JT
J Digit Imaging; 2000 May; 13(2 Suppl 1):33-8. PubMed ID: 10847358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Acute appendicitis: comparison of low-dose and standard-dose unenhanced multi-detector row CT.
Keyzer C; Tack D; de Maertelaer V; Bohy P; Gevenois PA; Van Gansbeke D
Radiology; 2004 Jul; 232(1):164-72. PubMed ID: 15155894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Acute appendicitis: comparison of helical CT diagnosis focused technique with oral contrast material versus nonfocused technique with oral and intravenous contrast material.
Jacobs JE; Birnbaum BA; Macari M; Megibow AJ; Israel G; Maki DD; Aguiar AM; Langlotz CP
Radiology; 2001 Sep; 220(3):683-90. PubMed ID: 11526267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optimizing the interpretation of CT for appendicitis: modeling health utilities for clinical practice.
Blackmore CC; Terasawa T
J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Feb; 3(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 17412021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of Lossy data compression of chest X-rays: a receiver operating characteristic study.
Kotter E; Roesner A; Torsten Winterer J; Ghanem N; Einert A; Jaeger D; Uhrmeister P; Langer M
Invest Radiol; 2003 May; 38(5):243-9. PubMed ID: 12750612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical evaluation of compression ratios using JPEG2000 on computed radiography chest images.
Sung MM; Kim HJ; Yoo SK; Choi BW; Nam JE; Kim HS; Lee JH; Yoo HS
J Digit Imaging; 2002 Jun; 15(2):78-83. PubMed ID: 12297972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic Accuracy of Noncontrast CT in Detecting Acute Appendicitis: A Meta-analysis of Prospective Studies.
Xiong B; Zhong B; Li Z; Zhou F; Hu R; Feng Z; Xu S; Chen F
Am Surg; 2015 Jun; 81(6):626-9. PubMed ID: 26031278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of JPEG2000 compression on detection of skull fractures.
McEntee MF; Nikolovski I; Bourne R; Pietrzyk MW; Evanoff MG; Brennan PC; Tay KL
Acad Radiol; 2013 Jun; 20(6):712-20. PubMed ID: 23664399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lossy three-dimensional JPEG2000 compression of abdominal CT images: assessment of the visually lossless threshold and effect of compression ratio on image quality.
Ringl H; Schernthaner RE; Kulinna-Cosentini C; Weber M; Schaefer-Prokop C; Herold CJ; Schima W
Radiology; 2007 Nov; 245(2):467-74. PubMed ID: 17890355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The study of diagnostic accuracy of chest nodules by using different compression methods.
Zhigang L; Kuncheng LI; Jinghong Z; Shuliang L
Eur J Radiol; 2005 Aug; 55(2):255-7. PubMed ID: 16036156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Feasibility Study of Real-Time Remote CT Reading for Suspected Acute Appendicitis Using an iPhone.
Kim C; Kang B; Choi HJ; Park JB
J Digit Imaging; 2015 Aug; 28(4):399-406. PubMed ID: 25700617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Added value of coronal reformations for duty radiologists and for referring physicians or surgeons in the CT diagnosis of acute appendicitis.
Lee KH; Kim YH; Hahn S; Lee KW; Lee HJ; Kim TJ; Kang SB; Shin JH; Park BJ
Korean J Radiol; 2006; 7(2):87-96. PubMed ID: 16799269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic value of unenhanced helical CT in adult patients with suspected acute appendicitis.
Ege G; Akman H; Sahin A; Bugra D; Kuzucu K
Br J Radiol; 2002 Sep; 75(897):721-5. PubMed ID: 12200239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Wavelet versus JPEG (Joint Photographic Expert Group) and fractal compression. Impact on the detection of low-contrast details in computed radiographs.
Ricke J; Maass P; Lopez Hänninen E; Liebig T; Amthauer H; Stroszczynski C; Schauer W; Boskamp T; Wolf M
Invest Radiol; 1998 Aug; 33(8):456-63. PubMed ID: 9704285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
