257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12307103)
1. State legislators introduce numerous abortion bills.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1973 Apr; 2(2):36. PubMed ID: 12307103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Doctors, hospitals may refuse to perform abortions.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1973 Apr; 2(2):26. PubMed ID: 12307100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Legislative record: state legislatures--1973 bills.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1973 Apr; 2(2):37-43. PubMed ID: 12307104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. State legislatures demonstrate continuing interest in fertility-related issues.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1978 Feb; 7(1):6-7. PubMed ID: 12277837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Milwaukee story: a public hospital's resistance to the Supreme Court abortion rulings.
Ambrose L
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1975 Aug; 4(4):68-72. PubMed ID: 12334289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Supreme Court denies reargument on abortion.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1973 Apr; 2(2):25-6. PubMed ID: 12307099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Supreme Court to decide if minors may consent to abortion, declares Roe and Doe don't protect nonphysicians, upholds jobless pay during pregnancy.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1975 Dec; 4(6):105-6. PubMed ID: 12258973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Alabama: city's comprehensive abortion rules invalid.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1977 Jun; 6(3):34. PubMed ID: 12259980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Over two-thirds of fertility-related state laws enacted in 1979 regulate abortion.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1980 Feb; 9(1):15-6. PubMed ID: 12278415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Supreme Court bars mandatory parental role in minors' abortions.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1979 Aug; 8(4):37-9. PubMed ID: 12278191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Restrictions on Medicaid abortions open to challenge on state constitutional grounds.
Klassel D
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1980 Dec; 9(6):95-8. PubMed ID: 12262416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Abortion and Medicaid: courts reject limits on funding medically necessary procedures.
Kalivoda P
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1979 Dec; 8(6):80-4. PubMed ID: 12278416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. New state fertility-related laws dropped sharply in 1980 to lowest total since 1972.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1981 Feb; 10(1):4-5, 14. PubMed ID: 12310241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The legal issues surrounding the continued refusal of hospitals to allow abortions.
Wasserman R
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1975 Jun; 4(3):50-3. PubMed ID: 12307552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Tracking the trends. Year-end review of 1995 state actions on reproductive health policy. Abortion services.
Sollom T
State Reprod Health Monit; 1995 Dec; 6(4):1-3. PubMed ID: 12291286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The consequences of abortion legislation.
Braude M
Women Ther; 1983; 2(2-3):81-90. PubMed ID: 12340335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Courts rejecting maternal health rational for hospitalization for all mid-trimester abortions.
Donovan P
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1980 Dec; 9(6):91-4. PubMed ID: 12262415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Court lifts ban on enforcing Miss. anti-abortion law.
Denniston L
Sun; 1992 Aug; ():3A. PubMed ID: 12286287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Residency rule for abortion invalid, two-day waiting period temporarily enjoined (Tennessee).
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1978 Oct; 7(5):79-80. PubMed ID: 12277900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Illinois, Massachusetts: governors veto restrictions on state funds for abortion.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1977 Oct; 6(5):57-9. PubMed ID: 12308832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
