278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12307104)
1. Legislative record: state legislatures--1973 bills.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1973 Apr; 2(2):37-43. PubMed ID: 12307104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. State legislatures demonstrate continuing interest in fertility-related issues.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1978 Feb; 7(1):6-7. PubMed ID: 12277837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. State legislatures: 1978 bills. 1. Bills enacted. B. Sterilization.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1978 Dec; 7(6):101. PubMed ID: 12278608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. State legislators introduce numerous abortion bills.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1973 Apr; 2(2):36. PubMed ID: 12307103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Overview.
Alan Guttmacher Institute AGI
State Reprod Health Monit; 1991 Dec; 2(4):i-. PubMed ID: 12346149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Tracking the trends. Year-end review of 1995 state actions on reproductive health policy. Abortion services.
Sollom T
State Reprod Health Monit; 1995 Dec; 6(4):1-3. PubMed ID: 12291286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. From the world beyond Washington. The states and fertility-related laws: an analysis at mid-year.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1987 Aug; ():4-6. PubMed ID: 12281329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Proposed Title 20 rules could jeopardize delivery of family planning services.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1975 Jun; 4(3):47-8. PubMed ID: 12307551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. New state fertility-related laws dropped sharply in 1980 to lowest total since 1972.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1981 Feb; 10(1):4-5, 14. PubMed ID: 12310241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Over two-thirds of fertility-related state laws enacted in 1979 regulate abortion.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1980 Feb; 9(1):15-6. PubMed ID: 12278415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contraceptive coverage, abortion dominate 1999 state, court activity.
Guttmacher Rep Public Policy; 1999 Jun; 2(3):10-1. PubMed ID: 12295187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Abortion.
Alan Guttmacher Institute AGI
State Reprod Health Monit; 1993 Feb; 4(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 12344859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Indiana: no immunity for judge who lacked authority to order sterilization of adolescent.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1977 Jun; 6(3):26-7. PubMed ID: 12259977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. State cannot require all minors to seek parental consent for abortion (Illinois).
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1978 Oct; 7(5):75-6. PubMed ID: 12277895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Doctors, hospitals may refuse to perform abortions.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1973 Apr; 2(2):26. PubMed ID: 12307100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Many state Medicaid agencies limit payment for abortion, sterilization.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1973 Aug; 2(4):82-3. PubMed ID: 12257657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Overview.
Alan Guttmacher Institute AGI
State Reprod Health Monit; 1993 Feb; 4(1):i-. PubMed ID: 12344861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. City bar declares limits on abortion funding unfair, constitutionally suspect (New York).
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1978 Oct; 7(5):79. PubMed ID: 12277899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Arkansas: State supports availability of contraceptives to all persons.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1973 Apr; 2(2):25. PubMed ID: 12307098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinic defense, parental involvement focus of state abortion debates.
Sollom T
State Reprod Health Monit; 1995 Apr; 6(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 12289004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
