194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12307552)
1. The legal issues surrounding the continued refusal of hospitals to allow abortions.
Wasserman R
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1975 Jun; 4(3):50-3. PubMed ID: 12307552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Milwaukee story: a public hospital's resistance to the Supreme Court abortion rulings.
Ambrose L
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1975 Aug; 4(4):68-72. PubMed ID: 12334289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Courts rejecting maternal health rational for hospitalization for all mid-trimester abortions.
Donovan P
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1980 Dec; 9(6):91-4. PubMed ID: 12262415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. State may require abortion clinics to be licensed.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1979 Aug; 8(4):46-7. PubMed ID: 12309469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Doctors, hospitals may refuse to perform abortions.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1973 Apr; 2(2):26. PubMed ID: 12307100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Supreme Court to decide if minors may consent to abortion, declares Roe and Doe don't protect nonphysicians, upholds jobless pay during pregnancy.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1975 Dec; 4(6):105-6. PubMed ID: 12258973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Supreme Court denies reargument on abortion.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1973 Apr; 2(2):25-6. PubMed ID: 12307099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. State legislators introduce numerous abortion bills.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1973 Apr; 2(2):36. PubMed ID: 12307103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fetal viability as a threshold to personhood. A legal analysis.
Peterfy A
J Leg Med; 1995 Dec; 16(4):607-36. PubMed ID: 8568420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. U.S. abortion policy since Roe v. Wade.
Mcfarlane DR
Am J Gynecol Health; 1993; 7(4):98-106. PubMed ID: 12288251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. State legislation on abortion after Roe v. Wade: selected constitutional issues.
Bryant MD
Am J Law Med; 1976; 2(1):101-32. PubMed ID: 973625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Grant recipients' rights in question.
Willson PD
Plan Parent Rev; 1984; 4(1):13-4. PubMed ID: 12266274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. State Medicaid abortion policies continue to be challenged; courts reach varying conclusions.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1979 Aug; 8(4):42-4. PubMed ID: 12309465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. High court hears clinic blockade case, as appeals court upholds abortion law.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1991 Oct; (17):2-3. PubMed ID: 12284473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Abortion and Medicaid: courts reject limits on funding medically necessary procedures.
Kalivoda P
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1979 Dec; 8(6):80-4. PubMed ID: 12278416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Regulation and the optimal size and type of abortion provider.
Haas-wilson D; Lindberg K
Appl Econ; 1999 Apr; 31(4):409-15. PubMed ID: 12295468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Restrictions on Medicaid abortions open to challenge on state constitutional grounds.
Klassel D
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1980 Dec; 9(6):95-8. PubMed ID: 12262416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. From the world beyond Washington. The states and fertility-related laws: an analysis at mid-year.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1987 Aug; ():4-6. PubMed ID: 12281329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Over two-thirds of fertility-related state laws enacted in 1979 regulate abortion.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1980 Feb; 9(1):15-6. PubMed ID: 12278415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Abortion in America: 12 years after Roe v. Wade.
Popul Today; 1985 Nov; 13(11):2, 8-9. PubMed ID: 12267463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
