127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12307825)
1. Bulk of family planning appropriations concentrated in a few states.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1976 Jun; 5(3):41-3. PubMed ID: 12307825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Family planning funds increased tenfold since FY 1971 while staff remained constant.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1977 Oct; 6(5):62-5. PubMed ID: 12308833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Family planning funds administered by the states increased 20 percent in FY 1978.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1980 Apr; 9(2):24-7. PubMed ID: 12336218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. States fail to assume responsibility for provision of family planning services.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1975 Jun; 4(3):45-6. PubMed ID: 12307550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Medicaid in FY 78: states fund abortions, U.S. covers other family planning services.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1980 Apr; 9(2):28-34. PubMed ID: 12336219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Illinois, Massachusetts: governors veto restrictions on state funds for abortion.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1977 Oct; 6(5):57-9. PubMed ID: 12308832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. From the world beyond Washington. The states and fertility-related laws: an analysis at mid-year.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1987 Aug; ():4-6. PubMed ID: 12281329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Grant recipients' rights in question.
Willson PD
Plan Parent Rev; 1984; 4(1):13-4. PubMed ID: 12266274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The attempt to break down overseas population assistance: Population Crisis Committee.
Camp SL
Interaction; 1986 Jan; 6(1):8-9. PubMed ID: 12340678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. AID to restore support to pop groups shunned under Reagan and Bush.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1993 Aug; (13):3, 4. PubMed ID: 12318257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. "Financing Family Planning Services: Is Categorical Legislation Still Needed?" Drs. McFarlane and Meier Respond.
Mcfarlane DR; Meier KJ
Am J Gynecol Health; 1992; 6(2):58-9. PubMed ID: 12317965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. "Financing Family Planning Services: Is Categorical Legislation Still Needed?".
Kring TC
Am J Gynecol Health; 1992; 6(2):58. PubMed ID: 12317964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Title (of the Public Health Services Act) passes, unscathed.
Neumann L
PP News; 1978; 1(3):14. PubMed ID: 12260862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. States fail to assume responsibility for administering family planning programs.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1976 Jun; 5(3):39-41. PubMed ID: 12307824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. States continue to expand eligibility for family planning services under Medicaid.
Gold RB
State Reprod Health Monit; 1996 Sep; 7(3):3-5. PubMed ID: 12347484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. USA government and family planning.
Landman LC
IPPF Med Bull; 1972 Aug; 6(4):1-2. PubMed ID: 12306202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Financing family planning services: is categorical legislation still needed?
Mcfarlane DR; Meier KJ
Am J Gynecol Health; 1991; 5(5-6):130-7. PubMed ID: 12344741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Congressional cuts threaten family planning programs.
Van Hoogstraat A
AVSC News; 1996; 34(2):1, 8. PubMed ID: 12347633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. State Medicaid abortion policies continue to be challenged; courts reach varying conclusions.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1979 Aug; 8(4):42-4. PubMed ID: 12309465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hillary Clinton takes up defense of U.S. aid for family planning overseas.
Cohen SA
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1996 Dec; (10):2-3. PubMed ID: 12291982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
