These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
26. The legal issues surrounding the continued refusal of hospitals to allow abortions. Wasserman R Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1975 Jun; 4(3):50-3. PubMed ID: 12307552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Proposed Title 20 rules could jeopardize delivery of family planning services. Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1975 Jun; 4(3):47-8. PubMed ID: 12307551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Compliance with new ban means no mention of abortion. Contracept Technol Update; 1991 Jul; 12(7):101-2. PubMed ID: 12284062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The consequences of abortion legislation. Braude M Women Ther; 1983; 2(2-3):81-90. PubMed ID: 12340335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Restrictions on Medicaid abortions open to challenge on state constitutional grounds. Klassel D Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1980 Dec; 9(6):95-8. PubMed ID: 12262416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. "Sound law and undoubtedly good policy": Roe v. Wade in comparative perspective. Mylchreest I J Policy Hist; 1995; 7(1):53-71. PubMed ID: 12346345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. County can't limit abortion funding more than state (New York). Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1978 Oct; 7(5):80. PubMed ID: 12260860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Title X program faces major upheaval as High Court okays ban on abortion speech. Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1991 May; (9):1-4. PubMed ID: 12343265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]