106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12312738)
1. Canadian regulation of contraceptive devices.
Smith MS
Contracept Deliv Syst; 1984 Jan; 5(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 12312738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Introducing new contraceptives.
Segal SJ; Coutinho E
Draper Fund Rep; 1986 Dec; (15):27-32. PubMed ID: 12341234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Contraception in the USA--an unfavourable climate.
Tyrer L
IPPF Med Bull; 1986 Aug; 20(4):1-3. PubMed ID: 12340838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Might generic OCs create contraceptive price war?
Contracept Technol Update; 1987 Feb; 8(2):13-7. PubMed ID: 12314977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Psychiatrically impaired patients often exposed to pregnancy risk.
Neinstein LS; Katz B
Contracept Technol Update; 1985 Jun; 6(6):88-90. PubMed ID: 12313658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Vaginal contraceptives merge old forms, new data.
Contracept Technol Update; 1983 Jul; 4(7):73-5. PubMed ID: 12339358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Planned Parenthood continues prescribing birth control for teens.
Contracept Technol Update; 1982 Jul; 3(9):110-2. PubMed ID: 12338301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Weighing risks against benefits in contraceptive safety.
Akhter HH
Draper Fund Rep; 1983 Aug; (12):20-2. PubMed ID: 12338977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. IUDs, implants, Depo-Provera have "incredible return on investment".
Contracept Technol Update; 1995 Jul; 16(7):81-4. PubMed ID: 12346506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Report of the SAC meeting in Chicago, September 1986.
IPPF Med Bull; 1987 Feb; 21(1):8. PubMed ID: 12340980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Attitudes toward family planning.
Gille H
Draper Fund Rep; 1984 Jun; (13):3-5. PubMed ID: 12339637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The common good. The Canadian bishops and the public debate on contraception.
Appleby B
Conscience; 1997; 18(3):15-9. PubMed ID: 12178874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Research needs in population and family planning: a view from the developing world.
Fathalla MF
Draper Fund Rep; 1978; 6():6-8. PubMed ID: 12335314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [The impact of family planning on reproductive health].
Trias M
Profamilia; 1992 Jun; ():4-13. PubMed ID: 12318090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. IUDs struggle to shake off legacy of past.
Barron T
Family Plan World; 1992; 2(1):10-1, 31. PubMed ID: 12317120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Internet opens access to contraceptive methods.
Contracept Technol Update; 1998 Sep; 19(9):120-1. PubMed ID: 12348705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Contraceptive options for perimenopausal women.
Alexander IM
Contracept Technol Update; 1999 Oct; 20(10):122-4. PubMed ID: 12322323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hearing focuses on price of Norplant; Wyeth pledges discount for public sector.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1993 Nov; (18):3-4. PubMed ID: 12318533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. What methods should be included in a contraceptive coverage insurance mandate?
Kaeser L
Guttmacher Rep Public Policy; 1998 Oct; 1(5):1-2, 12. PubMed ID: 12348739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Report calls for new revolution in contraceptive technology.
Durbin S
Popul Today; 1996 Sep; 24(9):1-2. PubMed ID: 12291557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
