106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12313207)
1. Sponge developer reacts to product's disadvantages; possible side effects.
Contracept Technol Update; 1984 Jul; 5(7):83. PubMed ID: 12313207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sponge subject of research, controversy in second year.
Contracept Technol Update; 1985 Jul; 6(7):93-6. PubMed ID: 12280148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The vaginal contraceptive sponge.
Edelman DA
IPPF Med Bull; 1984 Jun; 18(3):1-2. PubMed ID: 12266284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sponge proves highly effective after second year of comparative trials.
Contracept Technol Update; 1986 Jan; 7(1):4-6. PubMed ID: 12267618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. FDA prepares response to questions on sponge safety.
Contracept Technol Update; 1983 Sep; 4(9):103-4. PubMed ID: 12312835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Vaginal contraceptives merge old forms, new data.
Contracept Technol Update; 1983 Jul; 4(7):73-5. PubMed ID: 12339358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sponge survives first year; emerges top seller.
Contracept Technol Update; 1984 Jul; 5(7):81-2, 84-5. PubMed ID: 12313206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Contraceptive sponge makes debut.
Soderstrom RM
Plan Parent Rev; 1983; 3(2):10. PubMed ID: 12265635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Vaginal contraception--an update.
Edelman DA; Thompson S
Contracept Deliv Syst; 1982 Apr; 3(2):75-81. PubMed ID: 12338173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [The end of IUD marketing in the United States: what does it mean for American women?].
Forrest JD
Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1987 Mar; 15(3):291-300. PubMed ID: 12341479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Food and Drug Administration approves vaginal sponge.
Kafka D; Gold RB
Fam Plann Perspect; 1983; 15(3):146-8. PubMed ID: 6347710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. New Advantage 24 contraceptive gel claims 24-hour effectiveness. But proposed FDA rule could put N-9 products to the test.
Contracept Technol Update; 1995 Apr; 16(4):45-9. PubMed ID: 12347026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The sponge at three years: research studies new, rehashes old questions.
Contracept Technol Update; 1986 Jul; 7(7):80-2. PubMed ID: 12267909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Proper sponge removal is essential to avoid vaginal infections.
Contracept Technol Update; 1984 Jul; 5(7):86-7. PubMed ID: 12313208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Investigators unable to substantiate suspected link between sponge, TSS.
Contracept Technol Update; 1983 Dec; 4(12):153-4. PubMed ID: 12339516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A prospective study of the acceptability of Today vaginal contraceptive sponge among Malaysian women.
Ismail MT; Halim AJ; Arshat H
Malays J Reprod Health; 1987 Jun; 5(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 12269177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Be wary of methodology and biases in reading contraceptive failure rates.
Contracept Technol Update; 1986 Aug; 7(8):92-4. PubMed ID: 12268219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The vaginal contraceptive sponge: a new non-prescription barrier contraceptive.
Lemberg E
Nurse Pract; 1984 Oct; 9(10):24-5, 29-32, 37. PubMed ID: 6387547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Contraception and sexology].
Black JS
Cah Sexol Clin; 1991; 17(102):45-53. PubMed ID: 12344892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Contraceptive sponge patient insert warns of TSS.
FDA Drug Bull; 1984 Aug; 14(2):18-9. PubMed ID: 6479516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
