151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12315561)
1. An index of gender preference.
Ramakumar R
Janasamkhya; 1988 Jun; 6(1):79-92. PubMed ID: 12315561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fertility decline and gender preference--an experience of Kerala.
Ramakumar R; Devi KS
Janasamkhya; 1989 Dec; 7(2):121-38. PubMed ID: 12316274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Son preference, fertility desire and contraceptive use in two largest cities of Pakistan.
Farooqui MN
Pak Popul Rev; 1990; 1(1):54-64. PubMed ID: 12317086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Son preference and reproductive behaviour in rural Punjab.
Malhi P; Singh S
Guru Nanak J Sociol; 1995 Oct; 16(2):31-40. PubMed ID: 12292072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Gender preference in Goa.
Harikumar P; Ferreira A; Dixit SB
Indian J Matern Child Health; 1990; 1(4):146-8. PubMed ID: 12346032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is son preference slowing down India's transition to low fertility?
Mutharayappa R; Choe MK; Arnold F; Roy TK
Natl Fam Health Surv Bull; 1997 Jan; (4):1-4. PubMed ID: 12292159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Son preference in Pakistan: an analysis of intentions vs. behavior.
De Tray D
Res Popul Econ; 1984; 5():185-200. PubMed ID: 12266412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Geography and migration policies: the Indian experience.
Mehta S
Popul Geogr; 1996; 18(1-2):27-36. PubMed ID: 12179064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Parental sex preference and its effects on fertility intention and contraceptive use in Calcutta.
Bairagi R; Bhattacharya AK
Rural Demogr; 1989; 16(1-2):43-56. PubMed ID: 12285843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An attempt to measure female status in Pakistan and its impact on reproductive behaviour.
Manzoor K
Pak Dev Rev; 1993; 32(4 Pt 2):917-27. PubMed ID: 12346816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Family size, sex composition of children and contraceptive use: a case study of Kerala.
Suchindran CM; Ramakumar R; Sathi Devi K
Genus; 1993; 49(1-2):165-80. PubMed ID: 12345254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sex differentials in mortality: a corollary of son preference?
Sathar ZA
Pak Dev Rev; 1987; 26(4):555-68. PubMed ID: 12342011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Family sex composition preferences and contraceptive use in Thailand: a relative risk analysis.
Buravisit O
Warasan Prachakon Lae Sangkhom; 1989 Jul; 2(1):101-14. PubMed ID: 12316141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [The effect of the sex of living children on fertility].
Ulusoy M
Nufusbil Derg; 1986; 8():37-44. PubMed ID: 12159413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prenatal sex determination: a new family-building strategy.
Khanna SK
Manushi; 1995; (86):23-9. PubMed ID: 12319800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fertility behaviour and contraceptive use in Kenya: findings from a male survey.
Muvandi I
Afr J Fertil Sexual Reprod Heal; 1996 Dec; 1(2):136-45. PubMed ID: 12321196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Productive and reproductive choices: report of a pilot survey of urban working women in Karachi.
Kazi S; Sathar ZA
Pak Dev Rev; 1986; 25(4):593-608. PubMed ID: 12341745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sex preference of children and contraceptive use by women wanting no more children in Jakarta: 1968.
Iskandar N
Majalah Demografi Indones; 1974 Jun; 1(1):7-20. PubMed ID: 12333696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fertility level changes in India.
Sarkar BN
Janasamkhya; 1989 Dec; 7(2):103-19. PubMed ID: 12316273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Factors affecting contraceptive use in Pakistan.
Mahmood N; Ringheim K
Pak Dev Rev; 1996; 35(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 12292564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
