130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12316798)
1. Norplant's high cost may prohibit use in Title 10 clinics.
Contracept Technol Update; 1991 Apr; 12(4):49-52. PubMed ID: 12316798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A patchwork of funding sources for Norplant users in the U.S.
Antarsh L
AVSC News; 1992 Sep; 30(3):1-2. PubMed ID: 12285829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hearing focuses on price of Norplant; Wyeth pledges discount for public sector.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1993 Nov; (18):3-4. PubMed ID: 12318533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Wyeth-Ayerst to reduce U.S. price of Norplant implants, but not until December 1995. Family planners outraged.
Contracept Technol Update; 1994 Jan; 15(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 12319213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Norplant debate: dollars v. sense. Is Norplant discount in U.S. too little, too late?
Family Plan World; 1994; 4(1):1, 12. PubMed ID: 12318850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinics: Norplant cost chokes services.
Family Plan World; 1993; 3(5):1, 28. PubMed ID: 12319135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Arrival of Norplant may be bittersweet for clinics.
Contracept Technol Update; 1991 Jan; 12(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 12283523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinics struggle with high Norplant costs.
Family Plan World; 1993; 3(6):23, 29. PubMed ID: 12319106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Private sector joins family planning effort.
Front Lines; 1989 Dec; ():6, 13. PubMed ID: 12343476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Norplant may be too costly for low income women.
Family Plan World; 1991; ():7, 14. PubMed ID: 12346943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Special report... Norplant -- one year later.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1991 Dec; (20):1, 3. PubMed ID: 12343466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinicians, patients, Medicaid: is anyone to blame for Norplant removal dilemma? Part II.
Contracept Technol Update; 1993 Oct; 14(10):149-53. PubMed ID: 12286902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Surveying outpatient services in the Southwest.
Rich M
AVSC News; 1989 Apr; 27(1):4, 6. PubMed ID: 12315715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Will new Norplant foundation really help low-income women?
Contracept Technol Update; 1991 Jul; 12(7):112. PubMed ID: 12284067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Economic woes mean cuts to family planning services.
Contracept Technol Update; 1991 Jul; 12(7):104, 109-10. PubMed ID: 12284064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Health care reform and family planning services.
Policar M
Health Sex; 1993; 3(3):10-4. PubMed ID: 12286566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Suspension of IUD sales in the United States: what are the international implications?].
Ramirez FJ; Starrs AM
Perspect Int Planif Fam; 1987; (Spec No):28-34. PubMed ID: 12269049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Title X family planning clinics confront escalating costs, increasing needs.
Dailard C
Guttmacher Rep Public Policy; 1999 Apr; 2(2):1-2, 14. PubMed ID: 12349122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Implanted protection. Women slowly turn to Norplant use.
Kobren G
Sun; 1991 Jul; ():1C, 5C. PubMed ID: 12290563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. City officials planning to promote Norplant.
Banisky S
Sun; 1992 Dec; ():1A, 11A. PubMed ID: 12317958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
