295 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12317222)
21. Financing family planning services: is categorical legislation still needed?
Mcfarlane DR; Meier KJ
Am J Gynecol Health; 1991; 5(5-6):130-7. PubMed ID: 12344741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Key House panels vote to overturn gag rule, reauthorize Title X.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1991 Aug; (13-14):1-2. PubMed ID: 12317305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Regulation and the optimal size and type of abortion provider.
Haas-wilson D; Lindberg K
Appl Econ; 1999 Apr; 31(4):409-15. PubMed ID: 12295468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Funding for international family planning attacked.
Kaeser L
Contracept Technol Update; 1997 Aug; 18(8):101-3. PubMed ID: 12292727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Public Law No. 262, 25 March 1988.
United States. Pennsylvania
Annu Rev Popul Law; 1988; 15():51, 336-48. PubMed ID: 12289591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Act of 26 June 1987.
United States. Oklahoma
Annu Rev Popul Law; 1987; 14():50. PubMed ID: 12346753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. House seeks restrictions on "bogus" abortion clinics.
Family Plan World; 1991; 1(2):2, 5. PubMed ID: 12284514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Reproductive rights on firmer ground with prochoice White House, Congress. Special report -- abortion and the 1992 elections.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1992 Nov; (18):1-2. PubMed ID: 12285933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. States, Congress confront abortion services under Medicaid, health care plan.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1994 Jan; (1):3-4. PubMed ID: 12345518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The Clintons stump for health care reform plan as details slowly emerge.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1993 Oct; (15):2-4. PubMed ID: 12286981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Statutory Prohibition on Use of Appropriated Funds in Programs Where Abortion is a Method of Family Planning; Standard of Compliance for Family Planning Services Projects, 29 January 1988.
United States. Department of Health and Human Services DHHS
Annu Rev Popul Law; 1988; 15():13, 299-301. PubMed ID: 12289184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Senate committee approves bill to require drug discounts for clinics.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1992 Feb; (4):1-2. PubMed ID: 12284785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Sticking to its principles.
Sun; 1992 Mar; ():14A. PubMed ID: 12317218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The Milwaukee story: a public hospital's resistance to the Supreme Court abortion rulings.
Ambrose L
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1975 Aug; 4(4):68-72. PubMed ID: 12334289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Alan F. Guttmacher Lecture.
Morgentaler H
Am J Gynecol Health; 1989; 3(3-S):38-45. PubMed ID: 12284999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. USA: victory over gag rule for family planning groups.
Frankel DH
Lancet; 1992 Nov; 340(8829):1215. PubMed ID: 1359274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Congress again attacks international family planning.
Pine RN; Harper PB
AVSC News; 1996; 34(4):3. PubMed ID: 12321998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Reproductive rights in jeopardy. The Supreme Court upholds restrictions on abortion.
Gleeson K
ZPG Report; 1992 Sep; 24(4):7. PubMed ID: 12317715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Public funding of abortions and abortion counseling for poor women.
Edwards RB
Adv Bioeth; 1997; 2():303-34. PubMed ID: 12348330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Key policies emerging to govern delivery of family planning in Medicaid managed care.
Gold RB
Guttmacher Rep Public Policy; 1999 Feb; 2(1):3-4, 7. PubMed ID: 12321967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
