146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12317306)
1. Senate votes to fund UNFPA, reverse Mexico City policy.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1991 Aug; (13-14):2-4. PubMed ID: 12317306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. House okays $330 million for population.
Popline; 1992; 14():1-2. PubMed ID: 12317620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. AID to restore support to pop groups shunned under Reagan and Bush.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1993 Aug; (13):3, 4. PubMed ID: 12318257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The United States and the United Nations Population Fund: a rocky relationship.
Cohen SA
Guttmacher Rep Public Policy; 1999 Feb; 2(1):1-2, 14. PubMed ID: 12321966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Withholding of funding for UNFPA, 1988.
United States
Annu Rev Popul Law; 1988; 15():42. PubMed ID: 12289564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. China's one-child family: a famine-forced decision.
ZPG Report; 1985; 17(2):1. PubMed ID: 12340334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Study cites unmet world demand for contraceptives.. House panel votes to increase Pop Aid funding, rescind program restrictions.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1991 May; (8):1-2. PubMed ID: 12316871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Withholding of funds for UNFPA, 1989.
United States
Annu Rev Popul Law; 1989; 16():37. PubMed ID: 12344398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. AID renews ties with IPPF as major foreign aid policy changes are seen. But UNFPA funds being temporarily withheld.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1993 Dec; (19):1-2. PubMed ID: 12345356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Withholding of population funds, 13 August 1987.
United States. Agency for International Development USAID
Annu Rev Popul Law; 1987; 14():42. PubMed ID: 12346724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Exporting abortion politics: the battle over international family planning assistance.
Lasher C
Conscience; 1991; 12(5):22-3. PubMed ID: 12178849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Veto -- or threat thereof -- prevails over majority as 102nd Congress adjourns.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1992 Oct; (15):2-4. PubMed ID: 12317790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. U.S. moves forward on international promises.
Kawadler W
Reprod Freedom News; 1999 Jun; 8(6):4. PubMed ID: 12295139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The attempt to break down overseas population assistance: Population Crisis Committee.
Camp SL
Interaction; 1986 Jan; 6(1):8-9. PubMed ID: 12340678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. House battles over UN family planning funds.
Reprod Freedom News; 1997 May; 6(8):3. PubMed ID: 12292412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Stung by coercion controversy, China defends population goals.
Kennett J
Family Plan World; 1993; 3(4):1, 3. PubMed ID: 12288085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. House vote on Hyde changes dynamic of Congressional abortion debate.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1993 Jul; (12):1-2. PubMed ID: 12286695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Evaluating the impact of the United Nations funding act].
Profamilia; 1987; 3(8):15. PubMed ID: 12268896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. House agrees with president that delay in international family planning aid causes harm.
Reprod Freedom News; 1997 Feb; 6(3):3-4. PubMed ID: 12347836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. With firm resolve: family planning in China.
Laquian AA
Dev Forum; 1986; 14(1):3. PubMed ID: 12340547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
