265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12317577)
1. Who makes the abortion decision?: law, practice, and the limits of the liberal solution.
Lamanna MA
Res Sociol Health Care; 1991; 9():9-20. PubMed ID: 12317577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A sour note on Roe vs. Wade.
Roth JA
Res Sociol Health Care; 1991; 9():3-8. PubMed ID: 12317574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Roe v. Wade. Jane's perspective.
Kaplan L
Conscience; 1998; 18(4):27-8. PubMed ID: 12178883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Roe v. Wade. My prochoice journey.
Kennedy KR
Conscience; 1998; 18(4):28. PubMed ID: 12178916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Abortion and the law: the Supreme Court, privacy, and abortion.
Marsh FH
Adv Bioeth; 1997; 2():107-23. PubMed ID: 12348324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Roe v. Wade. Matters sexual.
Brickner B
Conscience; 1998; 18(4):18-9. PubMed ID: 12178915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Roe v. Wade. Wayward women.
Petchesky R; Joffe C
Conscience; 1998; 18(4):33-4. PubMed ID: 12178888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Anti-abortion movement.
Wilson K
Plan Parent Rev; 1985; 5(2):4-6. PubMed ID: 12340405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The consequences of abortion legislation.
Braude M
Women Ther; 1983; 2(2-3):81-90. PubMed ID: 12340335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Roe v. Wade. Revisiting the fundamentals.
Benshoof J
Conscience; 1998; 18(4):16-7. PubMed ID: 12178876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reproductive rights in jeopardy. The Supreme Court upholds restrictions on abortion.
Gleeson K
ZPG Report; 1992 Sep; 24(4):7. PubMed ID: 12317715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. For women, abortion can't be the whole story.
Beck J
Sun; 1992 Apr; ():13A. PubMed ID: 12343688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Abortion in a just society.
Hunt ME
Conscience; 1993; 14(1-2):33-6. PubMed ID: 12178856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Attitudes about abortion of women who undergo prenatal diagnosis.
Kolker A; Burke BM; Phillips JU
Res Sociol Health Care; 1991; 9():49-73. PubMed ID: 12317576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The uneasy case for a national law on abortion.
Correia EO
Am Prospect; 1991; (5):84-90. PubMed ID: 12285375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A caravan for women's lives.
Bader EJ
Integration; 1990 Apr; (23):38-9. PubMed ID: 12316327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Two steps back: Poland's new abortion law.
Nowicka W
Plan Parent Eur; 1993 Jun; 22(2):18-20. PubMed ID: 12287103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. 25 years after Roe: new technological parameters for an old debate.
Cohen SA
Guttmacher Rep Public Policy; 1998 Feb; 1(1):5, 12. PubMed ID: 12321448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Is a sociology of abortion possible?].
Isambert FA
Rev Fr Sociol; 1982; 23(3):359-81. PubMed ID: 12339246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Women and abortion: a phenomenological analysis.
Hill RP; Patterson MJ; Maloy K
Adv Consum Res; 1994; 21():13-4. PubMed ID: 12291499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
