344 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12318676)
1. "From the world beyond Washington". Special report -- 1993 state legislative actions and trends.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1994 Jan; (2):3-4. PubMed ID: 12318676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. From the world beyond Washington. The states and fertility-related laws: an analysis at mid-year.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1987 Aug; ():4-6. PubMed ID: 12281329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Overview.
Alan Guttmacher Institute AGI
State Reprod Health Monit; 1991 Dec; 2(4):i-. PubMed ID: 12346149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Illinois, Massachusetts: governors veto restrictions on state funds for abortion.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1977 Oct; 6(5):57-9. PubMed ID: 12308832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The nurse practitioner in family planning services: law and practice.
Roemer R
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1977 Jun; 6(3):28-34. PubMed ID: 12259979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Gag rule provision intact as conferees complete work on HHS funding bill. Abortion funding, parental notice dropped.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1991 Oct; (17):1-2. PubMed ID: 12284472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Financing family planning services: is categorical legislation still needed?
Mcfarlane DR; Meier KJ
Am J Gynecol Health; 1991; 5(5-6):130-7. PubMed ID: 12344741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. "From the world beyond Washington".
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1993 Oct; (16):3-4. PubMed ID: 12318482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Overview.
Alan Guttmacher Institute AGI
State Reprod Health Monit; 1993 Feb; 4(1):i-. PubMed ID: 12344861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. State actions on reproductive health issues in 1994.
Sollom T
Fam Plann Perspect; 1995; 27(2):83-7. PubMed ID: 7796902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tracking the trends. Year-end review of 1995 state actions on reproductive health policy. Abortion services.
Sollom T
State Reprod Health Monit; 1995 Dec; 6(4):1-3. PubMed ID: 12291286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Overview.
Alan Guttmacher Institute AGI
State Reprod Health Monit; 1992 Sep; 3(3):i-. PubMed ID: 12285804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. States, Congress confront abortion services under Medicaid, health care plan.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1994 Jan; (1):3-4. PubMed ID: 12345518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Over two-thirds of fertility-related state laws enacted in 1979 regulate abortion.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1980 Feb; 9(1):15-6. PubMed ID: 12278415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. New law will reduce teen pregnancy, family planners predict.
Contracept Technol Update; 1986 Mar; 7(3):25-8. PubMed ID: 12341225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. State legislation on reproductive health in 1992: what was proposed and enacted.
Sollom T
Fam Plann Perspect; 1993; 25(2):87-90. PubMed ID: 8491291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ethical issues in U.S. family planning policy.
Benshoof J
Draper Fund Rep; 1983 Aug; (12):11-2. PubMed ID: 12338973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reproductive rights in jeopardy. The Supreme Court upholds restrictions on abortion.
Gleeson K
ZPG Report; 1992 Sep; 24(4):7. PubMed ID: 12317715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Family planning funds increased tenfold since FY 1971 while staff remained constant.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1977 Oct; 6(5):62-5. PubMed ID: 12308833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. State legislatures demonstrate continuing interest in fertility-related issues.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1978 Feb; 7(1):6-7. PubMed ID: 12277837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
