These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

332 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12318850)

  • 1. Norplant debate: dollars v. sense. Is Norplant discount in U.S. too little, too late?
    Family Plan World; 1994; 4(1):1, 12. PubMed ID: 12318850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hearing focuses on price of Norplant; Wyeth pledges discount for public sector.
    Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1993 Nov; (18):3-4. PubMed ID: 12318533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Wyeth-Ayerst to reduce U.S. price of Norplant implants, but not until December 1995. Family planners outraged.
    Contracept Technol Update; 1994 Jan; 15(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 12319213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinics: Norplant cost chokes services.
    Family Plan World; 1993; 3(5):1, 28. PubMed ID: 12319135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A patchwork of funding sources for Norplant users in the U.S.
    Antarsh L
    AVSC News; 1992 Sep; 30(3):1-2. PubMed ID: 12285829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Norplant's high cost may prohibit use in Title 10 clinics.
    Contracept Technol Update; 1991 Apr; 12(4):49-52. PubMed ID: 12316798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Norplant may be too costly for low income women.
    Family Plan World; 1991; ():7, 14. PubMed ID: 12346943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Norplant contraceptive maker accused of profiteering on drug.
    Sun; 1993 Nov; ():13A. PubMed ID: 12287220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Will new Norplant foundation really help low-income women?
    Contracept Technol Update; 1991 Jul; 12(7):112. PubMed ID: 12284067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinics struggle with high Norplant costs.
    Family Plan World; 1993; 3(6):23, 29. PubMed ID: 12319106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Arrival of Norplant may be bittersweet for clinics.
    Contracept Technol Update; 1991 Jan; 12(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 12283523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. FDA review panel gives thumbs up to Norplant.
    Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1989 May; ():3-5. PubMed ID: 12290752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Another view on Norplant: match method with users.
    Herndon N
    Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1992 Oct; 13(2):24-6. PubMed ID: 12286081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinicians, patients, Medicaid: is anyone to blame for Norplant removal dilemma? Part II.
    Contracept Technol Update; 1993 Oct; 14(10):149-53. PubMed ID: 12286902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Implanted protection. Women slowly turn to Norplant use.
    Kobren G
    Sun; 1991 Jul; ():1C, 5C. PubMed ID: 12290563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Contraceptive development--the view from the U.S.A. in the mid 80s].
    Potts M; Siemens A; Burton N
    Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1986 Mar; 14(3):247-51. PubMed ID: 12268061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Implanon status report: not on U.S. market yet.
    Contracept Technol Update; 1999 Aug; 20(8):87-9. PubMed ID: 12295255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Special report... Norplant -- one year later.
    Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1991 Dec; (20):1, 3. PubMed ID: 12343466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Introducing new contraceptives.
    Segal SJ; Coutinho E
    Draper Fund Rep; 1986 Dec; (15):27-32. PubMed ID: 12341234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Norplant removals spur suits. Some recipients report problems.
    Leung S
    Sun; 1994 Jul; ():1B, 10B. PubMed ID: 12318799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.