These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1231943)
41. The right to refuse treatment: the real issue is quality of care. Appelbaum PS; Gutheil TG Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1981; 9(3):199-202. PubMed ID: 7326444 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Pennhurst, Romeo, and Rogers. The Burger Court and Mental Health Law Reform Litigation. Brant J J Leg Med; 1983 Sep; 4(3):323-48. PubMed ID: 6605401 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Medicine court: Rogers in practice. Veliz J; James WS Am J Psychiatry; 1987 Jan; 144(1):62-7. PubMed ID: 3799842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. The legal restraints on psychiatric care. Feldman WS Leg Med; 1980; ():221-7. PubMed ID: 7421390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Civil commitment of mentally ill--right to treatment--parens patriae power--right to liberty. Cooper GG Akron Law Rev; 1975; 9(2):374-82. PubMed ID: 11664558 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Some empirical findings on the right to refuse treatment. Carter JH N C Med J; 1983 Mar; 44(3):108, 113. PubMed ID: 6573573 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Still stuck in the cuckoo's nest: why do courts continue to rely on antiquated mental illness research? Davoli JI Tenn Law Rev; 2002; 69(4):987-1050. PubMed ID: 15295857 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. The right to treatment for mentally ill juveniles in California. Lovell JE Hastings Law J; 1976 Mar; 27(4):865-93. PubMed ID: 11664617 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Decade of litigation has led to redefinition of patients' rights. Weiner BA Hospitals; 1981 May; 55(9):67-70. PubMed ID: 7216209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. The role of the court as mental health laws change. Flaschner FN Ill Bar J; 1973 Nov; 62(3):128-35. PubMed ID: 11664277 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. The right to treatment case--that wasn't. Mancilla J Univ Miami Law Rev; 1976; 30(2):486-98. PubMed ID: 11664663 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. The patient always pays: reflections on the Boston State case and the right to rot. Gutheil TG; Appelbaum PS Man Med; 1980; 5(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 7412396 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Act 817 of 1979: Arkansas' new involuntary commitment law. Faulkner LR J Ark Med Soc; 1980 Apr; 76(11):457-63. PubMed ID: 6445353 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Supreme Court decisions on mental health: a review. Weiner BA Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1982 Jun; 33(6):461-4. PubMed ID: 7095767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Mental commitment cases of the 1971-72 Supreme Court term. Wing KR; Carman R Clgh Rev; 1973 Mar; 6(11):659-62. PubMed ID: 11664360 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Legal conceptualizations, legal fictions, and the manipulation of reality: conflict between models of decision making in psychiatry and law. Gutheil TG; Mills MJ Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1982; 10(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 6128038 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. The United States Supreme Court and mental health law. A retrospective. Perlin ML Med Law; 1985; 4(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 4038535 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Constitutional law--due process--involuntarily civilly committed mental patients have a constitutional right to treatment. Johnson RM; Wehrle-Einhorn RJ Univ Kans Law Rev; 1974; 23(1):188-205. PubMed ID: 11664536 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Constitutional law--right to liberty--involuntary confinement of mental patients. Tenn Law Rev; 1976; 43(2):366-73. PubMed ID: 11664691 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Treating the mentally disordered offender: society's uncertain, conflicted, and changing views. Hafemeister TL; Petrila J Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1994; 21(3):729-871. PubMed ID: 11660258 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]