132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1232074)
1. Narrow band noise audiometry: the effect of filter slope.
Orchik DJ; Mosher NL
J Am Audiol Soc; 1975; 1(2):50-3. PubMed ID: 1232074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The influence of audiometric configuration on pure-tone, warble-tone and narrow-band noise thresholds of adults with sensorineural hearing losses.
Stephens MM; Rintelmann WF
J Am Audiol Soc; 1978; 3(5):221-6. PubMed ID: 659294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of pure-tone, warble-tone and narrow-band noise thresholds of young normal-hearing children.
Orchik DJ; Rintelmann WF
J Am Audiol Soc; 1978; 3(5):214-20. PubMed ID: 659293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Active noise reduction audiometry: a prospective analysis of a new approach to noise management in audiometric testing.
Bromwich MA; Parsa V; Lanthier N; Yoo J; Parnes LS
Laryngoscope; 2008 Jan; 118(1):104-9. PubMed ID: 18043495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Acoustic reflex threshold and loudness discomfort level: relationships in children with profound hearing losses.
Holmes DW; Woodford CM
J Am Audiol Soc; 1977; 2(6):193-6. PubMed ID: 893187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. High-level psychophysical tuning curves: simultaneous masking by pure tones and 100-Hz-wide noise bands.
Nelson DA; Fortune TW
J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Apr; 34(2):360-73. PubMed ID: 2046360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Observations and statistical studies on the correlation between thresholds for pure sounds, filtered bands of white noise, and speech audiometry tests].
de Reynier JP; Bernath O
Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1976; 97(3-4):109-16. PubMed ID: 1005964
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Auditory threshold for white noise].
Carrat R; Thillier JL; Durivault J
Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1975; 92(10-11):585-600. PubMed ID: 1211738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Masking with wide-range and narrow-range noise in audiometric examination of the thresholds of bone conductivity].
Barsukov AF
Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1978; (2):33-7. PubMed ID: 644738
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Noise-excluding enclosure for audiometry.
Stark EW; Borton TE
Audiology; 1975; 14(3):232-7. PubMed ID: 1131126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Screening of deafness in the young child. Value, techniques and initial results of products of acoustic distortion].
Bonfils P; Avan P; François M; Loundon N; Elbez M; Trotoux J; Narcy P
Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1993; 110(1):3-8; discussion 8-9. PubMed ID: 8317861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of Stimulus Type on 16-kHz Detection Thresholds.
Buss E; Kane SG; Young KS; Gratzek CB; Bishop DM; Miller MK; Porter HL; Leibold LJ; Stecker GC; Monson BB
Ear Hear; 2024 Mar-Apr 01; 45(2):486-498. PubMed ID: 38178308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [What average hearing gains can be expected at present with children wearing hearing aids?].
Kruse E
HNO; 1985 Oct; 33(10):463-7. PubMed ID: 4066421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Asymmetry of masking in the European starling: behavioural auditory thresholds.
Langemann U; Klump GM
Hear Res; 2006 Nov; 221(1-2):26-35. PubMed ID: 16973317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The relationship of audiometric thresholds elicited with pulsed, warbled, and pulsed-warbled tones in adults with normal hearing.
Franklin C; Johnson K; Smith-Olinde L; Nicholson N
Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):485-7. PubMed ID: 19390442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Modulation transfer functions: a comparison of the results of three methods.
Scott DM; Humes LE
J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Jun; 33(2):390-7. PubMed ID: 2359280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Masking of the ear not studied in determining the auditory perception thresholds for ultrasound].
Khechinashvili SN; Gigineĭshvili GM; Shafir I
Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1975; (2):23-8. PubMed ID: 1146072
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Subjective audiometry with simple conditioning of young children].
Subotić R
Monatsschr Ohrenheilkd Laryngorhinol; 1966 Apr; 100(4):158-9. PubMed ID: 16114384
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Changes in the breathing noise as audiometric indicator].
Kumpf W
Aktuelle Otorhinolaryngol; 1970; 4():39-103. PubMed ID: 4399687
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Pure tone delayed auditory feedback: development of criteria of performance deterioration.
Cooper WA; Stokinger TE; Billings BL
J Am Audiol Soc; 1976; 1(5):192-6. PubMed ID: 956005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
